And has this “defining” of spam not been the default in Bitcoin from 2009-2024?
Was it “dangerous” to define and limit spam with filter policy before this change in v30?
What benefit to the network has the v30 created? No benefit, but it accepted data spam as legitimate use of Bitcoin as a data storage network.
I support and fight for Bitcoin as money.
Spam will perhaps persist as you say, but data storage will not be an accepted use case of the Bitcoin network.
Bip-110 will be implemented.
nicnym #BIP-110
npub1jr…lpnqf
2026-03-02 23:02:16 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…sps7
Author Public Key
npub1jr4jqdjwag3uxg9h2prkkdnh9df530efvrgddw55zgu62ak2x9gqylpnqfSeen on
wss://relay.damus.ioPublished at
2026-03-02 23:02:16 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "445a1185b07d44ef78adbfda5a2870a97cebd54cee575398981515b20a2be7c7",
"pubkey": "90eb20364eea23c320b750476b36772b5348bf2960d0d6ba941239a576ca3150",
"created_at": 1772492536,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a8491bc5434bc2c292d537082466ade25e337b700fad574fc34feec69713b996",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"6e41313ca6bea2434f3681c833e8f210b0547b469014436264b00ce805cea966",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"90eb20364eea23c320b750476b36772b5348bf2960d0d6ba941239a576ca3150"
],
[
"p",
"9cb3545c36940d9a2ef86d50d5c7a8fab90310cc898c4344bcfc4c822ff47bca"
]
],
"content": "And has this “defining” of spam not been the default in Bitcoin from 2009-2024? \n\nWas it “dangerous” to define and limit spam with filter policy before this change in v30? \n\nWhat benefit to the network has the v30 created? No benefit, but it accepted data spam as legitimate use of Bitcoin as a data storage network. \n\nI support and fight for Bitcoin as money. \n\nSpam will perhaps persist as you say, but data storage will not be an accepted use case of the Bitcoin network. \n\nBip-110 will be implemented. ",
"sig": "65ce8c7bc52f94faca5dcc0a97f4c1b966c5a3f1eb34d98b2332f9e2dd9c1fb1cb684b3ba51500975be809c9d64ca421d0b0568e72135a15b8cf6ef1002d1f23"
}