Join Nostr
2025-08-05 19:25:54 UTC
in reply to

MachuPikacchu on Nostr: Not agreeing or disagreeing here but wanted to think out loud and get your thoughts. ...

Not agreeing or disagreeing here but wanted to think out loud and get your thoughts.

Suppose we have a variable block size. What would it hinge on? Keeping transaction fees in a certain range? It feels like that could be gamed by pools who move their own funds back and forth to keep a baseline demand up and then we fill nodes faster than we currently do.

If we're worried about keeping a sufficient baseline hash rate when total block rewards are so low, the heatpunks would argue there will be a large group of heaters subsidizing the network.

Guess I'm trying to understand the mechanics of a market driven block size. I worry about premature optimization with bitcoin but it makes sense to hash out the details long before we may need them.