Very low.
I got accusatory and even rude right off the bat when Lanodan came right out the gate with "um we won't touch this until after you totally rewrite it in this completely arbitrary way" and I'm feeling quite vindicated with that disposition now. These people have a need to be oblique about their actual intentions and I've learned, over the years, how to suss out what things are really about.
Muh standard is a pretext at best. Not only does Pleroma not care about the standard, but I bet if I cherry-picked Alex Gleason (npub108p…yev6) 's commit and tried to submit it to Pleroma with maybe rewriting the commit message to "better ActivityPub spec conformity" or something like that, it wouldn't get accepted. Even if I directly supported it with the spec's actual exact words.
asberger animal :flag: (npub1vwr…fnzd) didn't want to merge my commit that includes the url field for scrobbling based on a misreading of the ActivityPub spec. The url field can be any representation of the Audio document, like a page about the document or an audio file, or, yes, a web page that streams the audio file. He insisted on me putting the user-submitted YouTube/SoundCloud/whatever URLs into externalLink for reasons.
It's farcical. I'm unlikely to try to work with these people again.
Dr. NEETzsche, GED /
npub1nl…7axrx
2023-12-14 22:39:23
in reply to nevent1q…j4h2
Author Public Key
npub1nl97dedk2anta9esnwjlv45m55v7sza25m3rcwgwlefn9ll9x2lqs7axrxPublished at
2023-12-14 22:39:23Event JSON
{
"id": "e85588db897101bd161ccd3e4459ddc435d5b8ed395db120741df55951017789",
"pubkey": "9fcbe6e5b65766be97309ba5f6569ba519e80baaa6e23c390efe5332ffe532be",
"created_at": 1702593563,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"79c2cae114ea28a981e7559b4fe7854a473521a8d22a66bbab9fa248eb820ff6",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"6387482bc4cbd27eab5eeb91f7f84eb3a17582c8291d331feb32bb089594b609",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"ec9dae9b3dc5951ac7d6cb7070d9c8bcf3998ed72fe4931906e6c7a5ead51ad8",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"24389949b53d16958eae22ba78a4040316903c933a9e8f9d9fd5f10688fc62af",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"9cda5c605f0035def959c5c7925ff9d1750da2c28bbde4887d7273d7bfba9e9a",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://iddqd.social/objects/b1ead674-73ee-4a03-b5bc-77c5fef55e20",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Very low.\n\nI got accusatory and even rude right off the bat when Lanodan came right out the gate with \"um we won't touch this until after you totally rewrite it in this completely arbitrary way\" and I'm feeling quite vindicated with that disposition now. These people have a need to be oblique about their actual intentions and I've learned, over the years, how to suss out what things are really about.\n\nMuh standard is a pretext at best. Not only does Pleroma not care about the standard, but I bet if I cherry-picked nostr:npub108pv4cg5ag52nq082kd5leu9ffrn2gdg6g4xdwatn73y36uzplmq9uyev6 's commit and tried to submit it to Pleroma with maybe rewriting the commit message to \"better ActivityPub spec conformity\" or something like that, it wouldn't get accepted. Even if I directly supported it with the spec's actual exact words.\n\nnostr:npub1vwr5s27ye0f8a267awgl07zwkwshtqkg9ywnx8ltx2as39v5kcysu9fnzd didn't want to merge my commit that includes the url field for scrobbling based on a misreading of the ActivityPub spec. The url field can be any representation of the Audio document, like a page about the document or an audio file, or, yes, a web page that streams the audio file. He insisted on me putting the user-submitted YouTube/SoundCloud/whatever URLs into externalLink for reasons.\n\nIt's farcical. I'm unlikely to try to work with these people again.",
"sig": "93b2e50e27c2b608cc1c53da70e39424a0c6e3f51981a63e2d63a196f9fe4fb1d7b88179abfe7eeeba921b0f1d3c2e79336cc51938898653a61a21a60837a46a"
}