yeah that's my basic takeaway as well.
i gave up supposition as to his motives. he seems to genuinely believe its in everyone's best interest for him to misrepresent the risks to encourage LN usage 🤷
but I dont think LN is theoretical. you can spin up nodes and pay for inbound liquidity to receive without kyc. ie, move sats around trustlessly.
but you'd never know if the routing nodes were conspiring against you.
nuance and tradeoffs...
