The technical definition of "dictator" is a government that governs autocratically (Not for the people, but for the special interests).
My point is that dictaroship is a flawed label because it is weaponized.
Non western regimes are mostly dictatorial (in practice), and representative democracies (US vassals and Zionist owned mostly) are non "dictatorial", so they are implied to be "good" or "better".
For example, in the US the government (100%, 1000%) doesn't represent or respect the wish of the people, majority or minority, doesn't matter.
The label given to the US government is "non dictatorial", so it is implied that it is "good", "better", etc. Many of us know better.
People will tell you (Especially in NOSTR), the US is a brutal oligarchy and is controlled by the AIPAC lobby to the extreme detriment to the people. But yet, it is "non dictatorial", so it is "good".
And yes, it is ok to disagree 👍
