There wasn't meant to be context. I think it's broad. Lets talk something simple, omitting risks for an agenda.
You think bitcoin is the solution to all problems in the world. The probability high that users will improperly use the tools, based on 100+ years of "things being the way the are" and you completely ignore those risks because _to you_ the probability is still there, but your perceived risk tolerance is much lower. "Well yeah of course you can screw it up and lose all of money, but would you rather be a subject of the big banks?"
Like how no one wants to talk about how retarded lightning is, and equally retarded it's competitors are, but here we are still having private conversations about it.
