rossbates on Nostr: Yeah I'm with you on that too. When people use the term "generalization" they're ...

Yeah I'm with you on that too. When people use the term "generalization" they're implicitly (and unknowingly) putting a frame around the information they seek or the tasks they're trying to accomplish. In a networked environment there's no need for an "everything" AI anyway. It's not a bounded concept nor an efficient design. There’s one caveat... Can we ensure billions of models will be able to communicate with each other?

I've been fascinated watching how GPT and DALL-E communicate instructions back and forth in plain English. The LLM as an API looks a lot more like how we human surface and transmit information with each other, where the underlying data we're using is encoded in a much more abstract way than we're able to communicate.