But if you're suggesting trading private property rights for privacy. If that's not on the table I agree.
I mean this literally. I should be allowed to film my property, ESPECIALLY for the sake of protection. No permission. Full stop. However that surveillance tape cannot be used by the state for any purpose (initiated by the state). I should also be allowed to share the footage of harm to myself or my property.
Totally different argument. Lets align on that plane.
Saying that every camera comes with mass surveillance as a prerequisite is a problem with the laws around the equipment and installation. Ban the state from using the footage. If your arguing legislation is the lever here, that's where it should be pulled. Stop aiming legislation at the individual and start aiming it at the state.
ChipTuner
npub1qd…3fqm7
2026-07-09 16:29:24 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…kpks
Author Public Key
npub1qdjn8j4gwgmkj3k5un775nq6q3q7mguv5tvajstmkdsqdja2havq03fqm7Seen on
wss://relay.primal.netPublished at
2026-07-09 16:29:24 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "3df48e97127cc93854f9bcbdb0ec5e9ec70b6f5752e53cf033f6912c9bfc2c66",
"pubkey": "036533caa872376946d4e4fdea4c1a0441eda38ca2d9d9417bb36006cbaabf58",
"created_at": 1783614564,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"9e717898bd3a63a5253ec11aa68bc8f5c9f35f30aff81432a089ce0371262f31",
"wss://relay.sovbit.host/",
"root",
"dd664d5e4016433a8cd69f005ae1480804351789b59de5af06276de65633d319"
],
[
"e",
"d9b269279361b66224edbea995c9a18247f47b6cfad1debc48d61ae2d93bd7cc",
"wss://freelay.sovbit.host/",
"reply",
"dd664d5e4016433a8cd69f005ae1480804351789b59de5af06276de65633d319"
],
[
"p",
"036533caa872376946d4e4fdea4c1a0441eda38ca2d9d9417bb36006cbaabf58",
"wss://theforest.nostr1.com/"
],
[
"p",
"010df0c948fe9ab54d2cb7ea420ffa08d57958981b6ea68e83aaa7eb2dd3f05a",
"wss://nostr.wine/"
],
[
"p",
"d28413712171c33e117d4bd0930ac05b2c51b30eb3021ef8d4f1233f02c90a2b",
"wss://relay.damus.io/"
],
[
"p",
"dd664d5e4016433a8cd69f005ae1480804351789b59de5af06276de65633d319",
"wss://nostr.land/"
]
],
"content": "But if you're suggesting trading private property rights for privacy. If that's not on the table I agree. \n\nI mean this literally. I should be allowed to film my property, ESPECIALLY for the sake of protection. No permission. Full stop. However that surveillance tape cannot be used by the state for any purpose (initiated by the state). I should also be allowed to share the footage of harm to myself or my property. \n\nTotally different argument. Lets align on that plane. \n\nSaying that every camera comes with mass surveillance as a prerequisite is a problem with the laws around the equipment and installation. Ban the state from using the footage. If your arguing legislation is the lever here, that's where it should be pulled. Stop aiming legislation at the individual and start aiming it at the state. ",
"sig": "584ef84dc00277190e0e7e0bdb08d4c4f8a4b0b22fab91fde20802e3b4fdf006380f9af0fba9b305d119864c83ded9bd80ccf9272c61fd8003bccec9703c5f59"
}