thejohnnycrypto on Nostr: you have always been allowed to keep some cash in a drawer at home. nobody ever ...
you have always been allowed to keep some cash in a drawer at home. nobody ever passed a law to grant you that. it was yours, and it stayed yours whether a bank was open or not.
this year, lawmakers started writing that same idea down for digital money. a bill in congress says in plain words that a person may hold and spend their own digital money themselves. one state signed a law protecting the right to keep your coins in your own hands. and a financial regulator is rewriting the rules for who is allowed to be a "qualified custodian," the licensed company approved to hold assets on your behalf.
and here is what stays with me. a right tends to get written into law right after somebody starts to question it. so this reads as a win and a warning printed on the same page. the win is that the right is now on the record. the warning is that it needed to be.
the fair pushback is that clear rules protect people. most of us do not want to be our own bank. we want a licensed company to hold the money, some insurance if something breaks, and a phone number to call. writing down who is allowed to be that custodian, and writing down your right to walk away from one, can protect both kinds of people at once. that is a real argument and i do not wave it away.
here is what would show me wrong. if five years from now you can still move your own coins between two wallets you control, with no license and nobody's blessing, then the written rules were a floor. if instead that plain act starts needing an approved middleman, we will know it was a fence.
bitcoin was built for exactly this question. a private key is a long secret number that lets you move your coins, and holding it yourself asks no one's qualification. there is no approval to wait on and no custodian standing in the middle. a law can affirm that right or wear it down. the key answers to neither.
if this gave you something to think about, Zap ⚡
Published at
2026-09-02 14:21:17 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "341fa97cfca4532f94ea12956042464e220b816ab469a90eeab73eb58fdefcc5",
"pubkey": "32637475ec0256fbd754571aeaa52c5454c9bd79fb7ac5b99f53b86cfcb9527a",
"created_at": 1788358877,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"r",
"wss://nostrelites.org/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.primal.net/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://purplepag.es/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.damus.io/"
],
[
"imeta",
"url https://blossom.primal.net/02657d8c51e4fde033cb44d713edbae35f9fe728f103ec73101a8db31fe049bd.png",
"m image/png",
"dim 1200x675",
"service nip96"
],
[
"client",
"Primal Web"
]
],
"content": "you have always been allowed to keep some cash in a drawer at home. nobody ever passed a law to grant you that. it was yours, and it stayed yours whether a bank was open or not.\n\nthis year, lawmakers started writing that same idea down for digital money. a bill in congress says in plain words that a person may hold and spend their own digital money themselves. one state signed a law protecting the right to keep your coins in your own hands. and a financial regulator is rewriting the rules for who is allowed to be a \"qualified custodian,\" the licensed company approved to hold assets on your behalf.\n\nand here is what stays with me. a right tends to get written into law right after somebody starts to question it. so this reads as a win and a warning printed on the same page. the win is that the right is now on the record. the warning is that it needed to be.\n\nthe fair pushback is that clear rules protect people. most of us do not want to be our own bank. we want a licensed company to hold the money, some insurance if something breaks, and a phone number to call. writing down who is allowed to be that custodian, and writing down your right to walk away from one, can protect both kinds of people at once. that is a real argument and i do not wave it away.\n\nhere is what would show me wrong. if five years from now you can still move your own coins between two wallets you control, with no license and nobody's blessing, then the written rules were a floor. if instead that plain act starts needing an approved middleman, we will know it was a fence.\n\nbitcoin was built for exactly this question. a private key is a long secret number that lets you move your coins, and holding it yourself asks no one's qualification. there is no approval to wait on and no custodian standing in the middle. a law can affirm that right or wear it down. the key answers to neither.\n\nhttps://blossom.primal.net/02657d8c51e4fde033cb44d713edbae35f9fe728f103ec73101a8db31fe049bd.png\n\nif this gave you something to think about, Zap ⚡",
"sig": "8b73c171c54d6e8e17a42fd1ff8baf993a83a4d44a823dd4341de8ffeaace01e12b3edc474a933922aef76f6796a73190eb887fafe5f57aeb1f13530beab3620"
}