I mean, yeah. But.. the fees on Liquid still make zaps uneconomical, a 160 sat fee on a zap won't work.
Aqua for instance is excellent, but the swaps needed to perform LN payments in the context of Zaps rules that out. Even native L-BTC "zaps" on Liquid onchain would still need at least 150+ sats per tx at 0.1 sat/vb min.
DevilishLemonBar 🦥⚡🏳️🌈
npub1y3…gvp4j
2024-08-05 16:24:06
in reply to nevent1q…s05w
Author Public Key
npub1y3k2nheva29y9ej8a22e07epuxrn04rvgy28wvs54y57j7vsxxuq0gvp4jPublished at
2024-08-05 16:24:06Event JSON
{
"id": "1c293b84c8c48605acd5d70f0c3c0ee9cb09f114a720b680cff1a34c3e76d050",
"pubkey": "246ca9df2cea8a42e647ea9597fb21e18737d46c4114773214a929e9799031b8",
"created_at": 1722875046,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f70abbd4463b37e817ce9b35d436510029644885e637b69c16af39968bb492eb",
"wss://relay.primal.net",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"99097983b74c70800b182abc6f64046ab70407e9cabcd6cf570a38ada9ef75d5"
]
],
"content": "I mean, yeah. But.. the fees on Liquid still make zaps uneconomical, a 160 sat fee on a zap won't work.\n\nAqua for instance is excellent, but the swaps needed to perform LN payments in the context of Zaps rules that out. Even native L-BTC \"zaps\" on Liquid onchain would still need at least 150+ sats per tx at 0.1 sat/vb min.",
"sig": "faa1facf315fe3b40d0158258263177235de8d2dc807997208fc6b9592d649cde0dd854260edec3ff3a8f2b344c9b450e1cb7e23b6d2452308acb6083c04f0e4"
}