Taylan Kammer (npub1y2c…25vu) Hoss “Cyber Jester” Delgado (npub1scj…el3p) My understanding of why CP is illegal in the first place, is that its production harms children... you know... the subjects.
And that's the same logic being used here, that oddly enough, if that analysis is correct, makes it harder to legislate against fake pizza. It's basically the same loophole the loli people use.
It'd be illegal to post taylor swift getting plowed by oscar the grouch but it would not make it illegal to post a Mrs. Generic Woman getting plowed by oscar the grouch.
The logic is that it harms the subject, in this case, their reputation. So what's the difference, then, between AI/photoshop images of taylor swift being plowed by oscar the grouch, and AI/photoshop images of taylor swift kicking a puppy?
And taylor swift is a public figure. Once it's illegal to generate/photoshop anything damaging to her reputation, even though she's a public figure, that same protection can be (loosely, they have less protections than celebrities) applied to politicians.
Punk Genius :verified_root: /
npub1tz…x4nlx
2024-01-28 07:30:52
in reply to nevent1q…q8ap
Author Public Key
npub1tzx6qj3kwalnuue90m3w87rzfja52g82d0x7n9g66yrd6z2ph0jq9x4nlxPublished at
2024-01-28 07:30:52Event JSON
{
"id": "976d6d904f1eb69a0f64c2f5006231ecca8f51b3335c41be1f2d91246b3821bd",
"pubkey": "588da04a36777f3e73257ee2e3f8624cbb4520ea6bcde9951ad106dd0941bbe4",
"created_at": 1706427052,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"22b1435fd08283b436beabaf7cf91b9ba1ad1fa70db0db0f05e1eaf2895bc1b3",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"86258564f12993bdc24900cfebf19c280d99857beed23c4b5029d0cd2460a390",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"06e9a6b96c894554b8f89eb6c544a69144fccc15366c78da8ad37f90214ece29",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://ligma.pro/users/r000t/statuses/111832403340553252",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1y2c5xh7ss2pmgd474whhe7gmnws668a8pkcdkrc9u8409z2mcxesy325vu nostr:npub1scjc2e839xfmmsjfqr87huvu9qxenptmamfrcj6s98gv6frq5wgqh0el3p My understanding of why CP is illegal in the first place, is that its production harms children... you know... the subjects. \n\nAnd that's the same logic being used here, that oddly enough, if that analysis is correct, makes it harder to legislate against fake pizza. It's basically the same loophole the loli people use. \n\nIt'd be illegal to post taylor swift getting plowed by oscar the grouch but it would not make it illegal to post a Mrs. Generic Woman getting plowed by oscar the grouch. \n\nThe logic is that it harms the subject, in this case, their reputation. So what's the difference, then, between AI/photoshop images of taylor swift being plowed by oscar the grouch, and AI/photoshop images of taylor swift kicking a puppy? \n\nAnd taylor swift is a public figure. Once it's illegal to generate/photoshop anything damaging to her reputation, even though she's a public figure, that same protection can be (loosely, they have less protections than celebrities) applied to politicians.",
"sig": "c11fd205f4879eca91dd02918eb0342cdfec3732d47483fbf2a4d18a0056a9c3d12b9939638e1a611f7fd7ac1676fedd3e0489a1b9c77ea35d1183ff2ed6c3c6"
}