vrilium:vrill: on Nostr: If you understand this. Why do you take under your wing the low value degenerate ...

If you understand this. Why do you take under your wing the low value degenerate "christians" who neither of us would want anything to do with? Why do you insist I speak for the low value degenerate "pagans"? I don't think of myself as Pagan either. The descriptions in the general sense of a christian or a pagan are both degenerate if you look at the people who use the terms to describe themselves. It is neither of our duty to defend the trash who wield terms that are hypocritical. Ancient Pagans would have destroyed any NeoPagan. Just as Ancient Christians would have destroyed any NeoChristian. You cannot have quality with numbers at the same time. Quality is always a low number, because it is scarce. You have to choose only one, quality or numbers. A few quality people, or a mass of complete degenerates. I prefer a few quality people. This is the only way to build a high trust society. You have to start with a seed of inherently good people and through their genetic children alone will you build a real high trust society. You cannot convert people into being good. No doctrine or text can make what is genetically broken, whole. It is a test in of itself whether they are good before they know any doctrine. Proselytization of virtue or trust never works and has never worked. It is genetic. Focusing on gathering the trash will only give you a trash heap. Everything is genetic. Trust is genetic. Virtue is genetic. It cannot be learned. Eugenics are based.