nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq0fp3ehl8utp98zgk6lx87uwkfxm9zq6z9varapeuluz9cdf3zfvse53ram (nprofile…3ram) nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq4xqqhck4h85rex0cszue6ge0pw8ycle97qj880g7p3mc29azjqaswwv2ca (nprofile…v2ca) nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqln5q8np5aezhtt7ztv6tah86xk4t3smjuchdvxp0u6uta056204qf4h82d (nprofile…h82d) nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqjtm4dxvu3ccgk60wvvt0uw9j9vz7nuc80f7agrv0vgkkushxk5zqnzj90y (nprofile…j90y) We've already had a couple of suggestions about a content rating tag. Someone suggested a simple "made for kids" tag. I've suggested two other ideas:
1. An MPAA/TV rating style tag that accepts G, PG, PG-13 and such. But James rightly pointed out that those labels are known mostly in America and not used other places. (MPA_A_, duh.)
2. A "content advisory" tag that could include codes for the _type_ of content, letting audiences self-select.
…