Mallard Beakman on Nostr: This is perhaps the most ridiculous part of patent law IMO. It's not clear to me that ...

This is perhaps the most ridiculous part of patent law IMO.

It's not clear to me that jurors are always literate, yet they are tasked with determining whether highly technical processes are covered by the esoteric language of patent claims.

quoting
nevent1q…gvmk

Because the jury found that OnePlus infringed claim 6 of the '954 Patent (see verdict sheet above), the jury determined that OnePlus sold devices that meet each and every element of claim 6.

To be sure, this is a lengthy claim with many elements.