I usually don’t set price targets based on fundamental or narratives but until the #Bitcoin network comes up with a consensual plan to migrate to quantum resistant cryptography, I think #BTC will have a hard time of reaching $200k.
Whether #quantum computing is 2 or 20 years away from breaking Bitcoin, this narrative will persist and undermine BTC performance.
Quantum resistance cryptography should be the focus of the devs to a greater degree than arguing about how to handle spam. I’m not sure to which extent progresses have been made on the issue.
LogicallyMinded
npub1s0…2rqf5
2025-10-17 14:53:04 UTC
Author Public Key
npub1s0fs9dwztm2rukm42vh6df4a5gwykclf75tgyeuc75t0cs2eh8rsu2rqf5Seen on
wss://relay.damus.ioPublished at
2025-10-17 14:53:04 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "a171bf79405d96f3eddf9df3df16d248109ee71097196910d09c41a2b837b0a6",
"pubkey": "83d302b5c25ed43e5b75532fa6a6bda21c4b63e9f516826798f516fc4159b9c7",
"created_at": 1760712784,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"bitcoin"
],
[
"t",
"btc"
],
[
"t",
"quantum"
]
],
"content": "I usually don’t set price targets based on fundamental or narratives but until the #Bitcoin network comes up with a consensual plan to migrate to quantum resistant cryptography, I think #BTC will have a hard time of reaching $200k. \n\nWhether #quantum computing is 2 or 20 years away from breaking Bitcoin, this narrative will persist and undermine BTC performance. \n\nQuantum resistance cryptography should be the focus of the devs to a greater degree than arguing about how to handle spam. I’m not sure to which extent progresses have been made on the issue.",
"sig": "640b98514e77ce092c9f628d773824c5e7325e95084049cd76b8f59900314d13dae082c331e0aebfaf635bc83fe929ed4d0428a2747ee23939e234ebabd10623"
}