I'll admit that's something to explain if you'll admit that the Fox news guy's face, lips, eyebrows, facial muscles etc. look nothing like the same on the british mask guy's face.
if you'll concede that, then the world we're in is: "good mask tech exists. the british video proves it. the Fox news guy's face is very much more life-like (essentially indistinguishable), so the available mask tech is many multiples better than what 'we're being shown'. Okay - so they _can_ pull off basically perfect faces, BUT when they're using the 100x better mask tech, they just get super careless around the neck... meanwhile, the crappy-looking british mask includes a simple bib down the front that easily solves the neck line issue."
This just strikes me as extremely unbelievable. Making the super advanced mask 100% unnoticeable by plebs on nostr would only require extending it a few inches longer - which is already the norm on much shittier masks in evidence - but they don't do it because....?
