nordlys on Nostr: So your argument is that because some of the money is lost along the way there ...

So your argument is that because some of the money is lost along the way there shouldn’t be any aid at all? Privileged much?

The consequences of halting foreign aid would likely be extremely severe and far reaching, affecting millions of people worldwide and exacerbate existing global challenges.

There’s something uncomfortable with people on their high horse arguing against helping those who are literally fighting for basic necessities such as food and water.

It’s the same feeling I get from wealthy people in the west who argue against Bitcoin because they don’t see why it can’t unlock financial freedom for the millions of people without access to banking or a currency that doesn’t hyperinflate.