Hina

https://fedi.yesmap.net/@Hina

PGP: 7D6D036C2ED1E8ECA3133B5D65C82325B01972C5

Homeserver: https://nekos.cafe
Matrix: HinamizawaShokogun22@nekos.cafe
Email: HinamizawaShokogun22@child.pizza
SimpleX: https://simplex.chat/contact#/?v=2-5&smp=smp%3A%2F%2FB-XClGKWmjiaEjDugwiLt-QrjnF_c5rstKs622E8Tz0%3D%402noy6gzle7leuokebdcpmw5a7r552gg3cxh6ydyyeb4n3uguxc4pbtqd.onion%2Fp3BdHXPmZe5hx9uDdE58fbdndC_pbEb_%23%2F%3Fv%3D1-2%26dh%3DMCowBQYDK2VuAyEAlvq7GayqmjU3dTqk

Public Key

npub1fx634fg9xah570pd5647hcjpwacu8aym3v5ylmqs646auqnvv6xq4pk8tc

NIP-05 Address

hina_at_fedi.yesmap.net@momostr.pink

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsyndg655znwm608sk6d2ltufqhwuwr7jdck2z0asgd2aw7qfkxdrqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsnarc86

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1fx634fg9xah570pd5647hcjpwacu8aym3v5ylmqs646auqnvv6xq4pk8tc

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-02-13 15:51:49 UTC

- reply

i'm no fan of khrushkev. but if you're talking about sexual rights specifically, he did reverse much of the stalin-era social conservativism (the economic "reforms" were obviously cancer)

2025-02-13 15:47:09 UTC

- reply

in retrospect, the one child policy continued for far too long and has created the opposite problem today

2025-02-13 15:45:24 UTC

- reply

Tsarist Russia had many laws regulating sexual morality, including laws against prostitution. In 1917 the soviets got rid of them all.

2025-02-13 15:37:18 UTC

- reply

Mostly no, tho there was a partial rollback. The USSR was the first nation in the europe to legalize abortion on demand, but that did not last. Most of the sexual morality laws never returned tho. The ones which did were often much, much more lenient than before. And much of stalinism was reversed during the khrushkev thaw

2025-02-13 15:27:44 UTC

- reply

There's also the fact that they got rid of basically all the morality laws in 1917.

2025-02-13 15:08:45 UTC

- reply

What do you mean by this?

2025-02-10 21:53:09 UTC

- reply

almost like both sides are pedos
https://fedi.yesmap.net/system/media_attachments/files/113/981/798/633/800/821/original/989830a4cb118edd.jpg

2025-02-10 02:11:51 UTC

- reply

I prob should patch the backend so it doesn't display that message lol. You def can ignore it

2025-02-10 02:08:01 UTC

- reply

or parents that dont give a fuck lol

2025-02-09 09:36:43 UTC

- reply

i dont see email when i sign up, so unsure what u mean

2025-02-09 09:35:23 UTC

- reply

It shouldn't be asking for email. Definitely isn't sending any confirmation emails, so u can ignore it. Unclear why its even asking for email when its disabled in config tho

2025-02-08 22:51:00 UTC

- reply

>from Panama to the North Pole
Trvmp is doing this btw

2025-02-08 15:01:11 UTC

- reply

>Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific oper-
ation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and
services to the entire population of this continent. For the first time in
human history it will be done as a scientific, technical engineering problem.
There will be no place for Politics or Politicians, Finance or Financeers,
Rackets or Racketeers.
>Technocracy states that this method of operating the social mechanism of the North American Continent is now mandatory because we have
passed from a state of actual scarcity into the present status of potential
abundance in which we are now held to an artificial scarcity forced upon
us in order to continue a Price System which can distribute goods only by
means of a medium of exchange. Technocracy states that price and
abundance are incompatible; the greater the abundance the smaller the
price. In a real abundance there can be no price at all. Only by abandoning the interfering price control and substituting a scientific method of
production and distribution can an abundance be achieved. Technocracy
will distribute by means of a certificate of distribution available to every
citizen from birth to death.
>The Technate will encompass the entire American Continent from
Panama to the North Pole because the natural resources and the natural
boundaries of this area make it an independent, self-sustaining geographical unit. Technocracy's blueprints have been designed for this continent
and for no other. It is an American Plan for the American continent, No
imported political philosophies including Democracy are in any way applicable.
https://fedi.yesmap.net/system/media_attachments/files/113/968/864/768/496/216/original/e2218ccebcd510b8.jpg

2025-02-08 06:49:00 UTC

- reply

Kind of always has been tbh. Some parts of it were ok in like the 70s. Before that, they teamed up with the KKK, so lol

2025-02-08 06:36:56 UTC

- reply

>hinasreallover

2025-02-05 01:15:25 UTC

- reply

In my experience it's literally the opposite. Privileged middle class (PMC lmao) is the least likely to cheat cus they're the least likely to fuck. Re. divorce, this is literally impossible unless u believe the majority of marriages are abusive.

2025-02-04 06:58:01 UTC

- reply

She did not share those views. Even if she did share those views, it's difficult to be sure, and in the meantime you have to hold some things back. By original answer I mean this btw:
>felt like it + wasn't risking anything of value

2025-02-04 06:50:47 UTC

- reply

I didn't find it out until later on, but it's def true. If you don't believe it as a justification, you can referal to my original answer

2025-02-04 06:48:49 UTC

- reply

Being truly honest with my partner would have endangered my safety. I'm sure you're aware of the hatred many folx have towards pedophiles?

2025-02-04 06:33:21 UTC

- reply

She was a BPD psycho

2025-02-04 06:31:44 UTC

- reply

Yeah. I wouldn't say I was dependent on her, cus like I had some side hustles, but she definitely had far more money than me. If she truly knew all of my motives, she might have become violent even if we weren't in a relationship, tho I wouldn't have known that at the time. A big part of why she was so vengeful, was because she became convinced I was a pedophile (not wrong, but lol). I don't see this as very different

2025-02-04 06:14:57 UTC

- reply

She provided a false hope that she wouldn't assault me

2025-02-04 06:11:53 UTC

- reply

I don't consider cheating to be wrong

2025-02-04 06:11:30 UTC

- reply

Yes, this is definitely institutional. Encoded into law even.

2025-02-04 06:09:40 UTC

- reply

Arguably not cheating on her would have been cuckery

2025-02-04 06:08:37 UTC

- reply

You did extensively in our earlier discussion regarding sex work.

2025-02-04 06:06:54 UTC

- reply

TBH I find it kind of hard to believe that a man could have that level of misandry.

2025-02-04 06:01:37 UTC

- reply

You were perfectly fine talking about it when it was about things that favor men

2025-02-04 05:54:54 UTC

- reply

There was zero violence on my part. This is not uncommon, because women know that they can assault men without consequences. 70% of unilateral domestic violence is female on male.

2025-02-04 05:46:40 UTC

- reply

It 100% is. I'll put it this way: she assaulted me in broad daylight, and pulled a knife (shut the door and bolted before she could use it, but still), police officer arrived at the scene, and it was me that was arrested, not her. Couldn't find any evidence that I did anything illegal, or that I hurt her in any way. Only thing I did "wrong" was sleep with someone she did not approve. Earlier you said it was enslavement for a married woman to be divorced ("cut off from money") as a result of cheating on their husband. Why is physical assault (arguably attempted murder) acceptable when the person trying to "find true love" is a man?

2025-02-04 05:33:20 UTC

- reply

I did leave after that. That was my apartment, but I was eventually able to get it back and change the locks. I don't think there was anything wrong with what I did, nor did faculty cus countless calls and prob hundreds of thousands in expensive lawyers (on her part) wasn't enough to get me expelled. I think all things considered I was courteous and extremely respectful, if she were a guy I'd have knocked her teeth in the moment she tried to lay her hands on me, but instead I didn't even raise my arms.

2025-02-04 05:02:55 UTC

- reply

I wouldn't exactly be that upset if she broke up

2025-02-04 01:11:31 UTC

- reply

There was a movement that advocated for this in the 1930s. Also a planned economy for for the UNITED STATES OF NORTH AMERICA (canadians btfo)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocracy_movement
https://fedi.yesmap.net/system/media_attachments/files/113/942/953/316/671/315/original/f751589165b5fe91.png

2025-02-04 01:03:17 UTC

- reply

felt like it + wasn't risking anything of value

2025-02-03 22:50:47 UTC

- reply

When it happened to me it was cus I cheated on her. But tbh, when a significant fraction of women consider porn to in of itself justify physical assault, it doesn't matter what you did

2025-02-03 21:58:22 UTC

- reply

Avoiding the fight is the better option, because while you will still get arrested, there's no law against being hit by a woman, only for striking back. Obviously, this wont save you from jail, but it will save you from prison. Literally government guidelines say that all female on male violence is justified, because it must have been provoked by male behavior.

2025-02-03 21:36:43 UTC

- reply

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_revolution_of_1918%E2%80%931919

2025-02-03 21:10:34 UTC

- reply

The data disagrees. 70% of non-reciprocal violence is female on male. Beliefs like this are why its basically legal for women to assault men.
Men attack innocent women.
Women are pushed to their breaking point, forced to resort to physical violence in a desperate attempt to hold men accountable for their unacceptable behavior.
>In 70% of the non-reciprocally violent relationships women were the perpetrators of violence.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-psychiatrist/article/domestic-violence-is-most-commonly-reciprocal/C5432B0C6F8F61B49A4E2B60B931FA07

2025-02-03 20:45:21 UTC

- reply

I'm not revealing much tbh. My time zone narrows things more, but there's things I'm obviously leaving out. I What I can say is that its with some rich folx I've known/mooched off of for the past few years. I trust them and there's no explicit sexual favors required, but like this is more than just free gifts, it's obvious why they are being so generous. It's obviously transactional.

2025-02-03 20:02:47 UTC

- reply

Anywhere where homelessness is even a coherent thing to talk about is probably developed enough that Syphilis can be easily treated. Places where its still a problem today are places where there is no government, homelessness is not just a social problem for the destitute, but the way most people live cus everything was bombed, etc.

2025-02-03 19:53:57 UTC

- reply

All the stuff about syphilis being a problem for sex workers in 2025, for starters.

2025-02-03 19:50:02 UTC

- reply

I didn't expect him to, tho i don't expect socialism to happen at the ballot box. What I did think is that if elected, he would be much better than Clinton or Trump

2025-02-03 19:47:25 UTC

- reply

I'm not doing it for money so much as free rent. Objectively it is a paid job. Some people might wish it didn't exist, but by definition, sex work does involve the exchange of time for money

2025-02-03 19:44:10 UTC

- reply

The harmful aspects definitely shouldn't be ignored. Ideally there would be no sex work because there would be no work.

2025-02-03 19:40:46 UTC

- reply

A lot of the arguments u are making just dont check out factually, but whenever I counter them, u just spit out a new one. It's like a gish gallop, tho I'll give you the benefit of the doubt since u might not be doing this intentionally.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop

2025-02-03 19:35:03 UTC

- reply

Earlier you said that it does not pay well. Obviously only one can be true, so this really makes me think that relative wage levels are not the basis of your objection.

2025-02-03 19:30:02 UTC

- reply

>i did state my idea isn't moral but overall based on objective facts on what is currently possible, the current system does not allow women and other marginalized groups to have a functional job without being low on their wages so they resort to sex work as there are countless studies which do prove it
Yes this is definitely true. Basically all the folx I know who have done sex work did it because conventional side hustles weren't enough to make ends meet. I actually am going to be in a living situation that probably qualifies sex work, cus rent in some cities is simply impossible.
>I also put forth the source which argued that such sex workers are blacklisted by companies and by societal norms as their brand would be at stake for hiring employees afflicted with sex work, but you believe that I take a moral stance on this despite the arguments being far away from morals and more strictly towards documenting the abusive practices of such jobs
Also very true, there is a large social stigma against "undignified" forms of labor. Criminalization does not help.

2025-02-03 19:20:08 UTC

- reply

I don't truly know what the actual reason for your belief is, because you aren't saying it. I suggested moral cus its a common one that people believe but dont say. There are other ones, but i can't read your mind.

2025-02-03 19:16:36 UTC

- reply

It pays better and is more enjoyable than alternative forms of work

2025-02-03 19:14:23 UTC

- reply

I think whats going on is that like you are against sex work for a reason you aren't telling us (my guess is moral), then ur bringing up a bunch of unrelated justifications which don't neccessarily prove the factual harm case you are writing down. When they're countered, it disproves the justification, but it doesn't address the actual reason you oppose sex work, so you come up with new justifications.

2025-02-03 19:05:37 UTC

- reply

severe cases the treatment is take 3 doses

2025-02-03 19:04:04 UTC

- reply

This is probably a better argument, and is closer to what you believe. I'm glad that u brought up Kollantai, cus I'm a big fan of her work tbh. It definitely does extend to other work, thats a big part of her argument that ending wage labor also implies ending not just prostitution, but also the nuclear family

2025-02-03 18:58:19 UTC

- reply

Yes, close to nobody actually dies from syphillis, even untreated. It's usually opportunistic fungal infections, tho there are a small number of documented cases where syphilis was the direct cause of death. Untreated syphilis is more like leperosy than anything else: won't kill you, but if untreated, might progress to the point where u wish u were dead (in the era where treatments for advanced syphilis did not yet exist)

2025-02-03 18:52:06 UTC

- reply

This is the price in poorer rural communities btw

2025-02-03 18:50:37 UTC

- reply

11 cents is not an exorbitant price. it's literally pennies

2025-02-03 18:49:24 UTC

- reply

U don't have to believe the UN, even without their help, you can buy it yourself for $0.11

2025-02-03 18:46:44 UTC

- reply

This is why the United Nations and World Health Organization has worked very hard to make antibiotics available even in extremely poor countries. Pennicillin is not expensive at all tho. Like not even a dollar:
>As an off-patent medication, BPG is currently sold at a very low price. CHAI estimated that it is sold on average at a cost of US$0.11 for a 1.2 million international unit (IU) dose and US$0.20 for 2.4 million IU dose in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs).

2025-02-03 18:38:46 UTC

- reply

This really isn't even 3rd world, but like 4th world. Like Gaza or sub saharran africa. Honestly, in these countries, syphillis is very low on the list of concerns, cus dysentery will kill you much faster (days vs decades).

2025-02-03 18:31:43 UTC

- reply

In third world countries its curable too, its just that ur less likely to see a doctor. Pennicilin is on the WHO's list of essential medicines. Any doctor will have it, problem in 3rd world countries is that you might not see a doctor

2025-02-03 18:22:58 UTC

- reply

Syphilis is a problem of the past, gonnorhea is a problem today, but not a serious one. It's rarely life threatening, and antibiotics can easily cure it without complications. The main problem is that people are too embarassed about having it to tell a doctor. It's in a similar category as strep throat or a UTI, but with more social stigma.

2025-02-03 18:16:36 UTC

- reply

Lol at syphilis especially tho, cus its famous for being extremely vulnerable to antibiotics, even by STD standards. Gonnarhea might inconvenience you before u see a doctor and finish the pills that make it go away. With syphilis, if you get it (probably from sex with animals, its rare in humans outside of 3rd world countries), doc will probably know before u do, it takes a very long time to develop symptoms.

2025-02-03 18:04:23 UTC

- reply

Syphillis was a major problem in the 19th century. We have much better treatments now, like Pennicilin, which was invented in 1928.

2025-02-03 18:00:11 UTC

- reply

And since the discovery of pennicilin, syphilis has become a nonissue outside of like subsaharan africa because pennicilin is literally all it takes to cure it. Syphillis is a very slow and weak disease, so only way it'd get anywhere close to stage 3 is if you literally have not seen a doctor in decades. Every doctor knows it, cus while disfiguring if left untreated, pennicilin is basically a magic cure against it, the flu is much harder to treat.

2025-02-03 17:37:48 UTC

- reply

Tip related to this, if a hag ever attacks you, do not get the police involved, under any circumstances. Obviously do not defend yourself in any way, including blocking or disarming. If she is unarmed, ignore her and slowly walk away. The more you let things escalate, the more likely she is to hit your ribcage and bruise her fists. If she has a knife, just run, unless police are at the scene in which case just stay calm and plead the 5th. Afterwards, cut off all contact, if she did it once, she'll prob do it again. Document everything she sends, but do not respond, the best case scenario is if she forgets about you completely.
If you need medical treatment but it is NOT AN EMERGENCY, wait a couple days and opt for urgent care instead of hospital/ER. If it IS AN EMERGENCY, go to the hospital right away, risking an arrest is far better than risking your life. When talking to medical professionals, don't say that your gf attacked you, say that it was a bar fight (or say nothing at all). That way, even if you are accused later, its hard to prove that a fight happened (unless you actually struck back, in which case you're fucked). Even if she injures herself, police can easily tell that the wounds are self inflicted, so they probably won't be convinced.
The more time passes since the incident, the safer you are, but remember that when a woman attacks a man, standard guidelines are to assume that the man did SOMETHING to deserve it, so at best you're a scumbag whose behavior is not yet punishable by law.

2025-02-03 15:23:19 UTC

- reply

I mean the vast majority of domestic violence is unreciprocated female on male

2025-02-02 18:29:32 UTC

- reply

dats literally him doe

2025-02-02 18:23:44 UTC

- reply

this does prove my case about chud lib horseshoe theory

2025-02-02 18:09:11 UTC

- reply

Ur basically a conservative tbh.

2025-02-02 18:05:34 UTC

- reply

Romeo and Juliette would prob be boycotted today cus he's 21 and she's 13

2025-02-02 17:52:09 UTC

- reply

Slaves were not prostitutes, prostitution was a higher class occupation reserved for citizens. Sexual slavery was obviously very common too, but is an entirely different practice

2025-02-02 17:50:27 UTC

- reply

RN the vast majority of sex work is solo, like 90% cus of the internet. Do you notice tho how the moment 1 harm disappears, a new unrelated justification shows up of how it must be either harmful or impossible? Like here:
>with more competition people wouldn't just stick to solo sex work for longer as it would not be an option if they are to have a stable audience
It's okay if your objection is moral, not harm based, but you prob should be honest with yourself about that.

2025-02-02 17:46:58 UTC

- reply

You're dodging the question again.

2025-02-02 17:43:13 UTC

- reply

Explain how a web camera can get you pregnant

2025-02-02 17:42:02 UTC

- reply

So it is impossible to sell sex without first getting plastic surgery? How did prostitution work in ancient rome?

2025-02-02 17:40:00 UTC

- reply

yes, no medical procedure is risk free. Neither IUDs nor the risk of pregnancy is inherent either tho, there is a 0% chance that you will get pregnant from a camera.

2025-02-02 17:32:15 UTC

- reply

Is plastic surgery inherent to sex work? The USA does the most plastic surgeries per capita, we also have the lowest prostitution rates cus outside of Las Vegas we have the harshest anti-prostitution laws

2025-02-02 17:29:07 UTC

- reply

I provided one that is very old, has no side effects, and is 100% effective. Not putting a penis in a vagina. U can get an IUD for $300 tho, less than $100 with insurance I don't know what country you live in, but it shouldn't take "years" to pay a $100 debt

2025-02-02 17:25:05 UTC

- reply

>the problem isn't about engaging with sex work, but what sex work has been offering individuals lately and with recent studies it's only ending up being more harmful to individuals with their physical and mental health in decline than any significant positive progress
30 years in the coal mines destroyed my great grandfather's lungs, probably cut a decade off from his life. I don't know of many people who are crippled by camgirl injuries. Are you sure this is about mental health and not a moral issue?

2025-02-02 17:15:34 UTC

- reply

The same applies for car infomercials, if anything beauty standards are even stricter. IUDs are pretty safe and well studied, far moreso 90% of medications.The fact you put that in the same paragraph as completely unneccessary things like plastic surgery suggests that its not really about the medical risk tho.

2025-02-02 17:02:13 UTC

- reply

pregnant from masturbating?

2025-02-02 17:01:43 UTC

- reply

you're assuming a lot of things that are literally not true tho. I'm not the biggest fan of marriage, but I'll put it this way, my aunt got pregnant in 8th grade. She actually has a graduate degree now, this would have been much harder as a single mom.

2025-02-02 16:54:22 UTC

- reply

I would rather jack off in front of a camera than be forced to act for a car informmercial, by far. Platform would definitely take a lot more too.

2025-02-02 16:51:30 UTC

- reply

there's basically zero overlap between child marriage as a practice and child prostitution. With the exception of cultures like the ashkenazi jews, child marriage was mostly an upper class thing, also the child could walk out any time while the adult could not.

2025-02-02 16:47:24 UTC

- reply

>with sex work I'm against it in the sense that under capitalism it's essentially just abuse for the sex worker who gets little in return
Can u not say the same thing about literally all wage labor? If anything with sex work it is much easier to be self employed, removing out the need for a boss

2025-02-02 16:43:26 UTC

- reply

This is where the eugenics movement comes from

2025-02-02 16:43:07 UTC

- reply

I mean like concretely today, what are your thoughts on men cheating on their wives (or girlfriend if ur anti-marriage)

2025-02-02 16:37:40 UTC

- reply

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_purity_movement

2025-02-02 16:34:46 UTC

- reply

What are your thoughts on cheating?

2025-02-02 16:31:11 UTC

- reply

you're reading a lot into that lol

2025-02-02 16:30:13 UTC

- reply

A lot of the time the "conservative" and "progressive" ideas are literally the same, only difference is language/branding. The entire "grooming" and "abuse" discourse is poisoned by this imo. Like to the degree where so called "progressives" support ideas which if applied consistently are basically indistinguishable from the ideology of the 1920s KKK

2025-02-02 16:03:47 UTC

- reply

Issue is that you're only allowed to have opinions if your lived experience conforms to conservative sexual norms.

2025-02-02 12:59:35 UTC

- reply

NNIA really isn't it tho. Not up to me, they would not tolerate me being anywhere near them. ThI had to create my own instance cus a lot of ppl in Lecter's circle started this weird conspiracy theory about how I was secretly behind everything they disliked on the internet. Pretty much every day, people on there were calling for "people like me" to be doxed, or even killed. Nobody did anything ofc, but even that is basically indistinguishable from actual antis. Yeah, it's not worth it.

2025-02-02 11:42:01 UTC

- reply

there's antis on NNIA tho. Iris is one of the better known ones

2025-02-02 06:39:01 UTC

- reply

Literally because of shit like this

2025-02-02 02:59:58 UTC

- reply

I'm the first mod he appointed, before the instance was even public. I've been involved with yesmap since like 2022, long before there even was a fedi instance.

2025-02-02 02:57:46 UTC

- reply

I'm not a nazi lol. Tho I get why you hate me now

2025-02-02 02:56:10 UTC

- reply

I'm literally the first mod here and am like 50% of the reason fedi.yesmap even exists

2025-02-02 02:54:13 UTC

- reply

What's your problem with me lol? You don't seem like an antisemite to me.

2025-02-02 02:49:39 UTC

- reply

Kuzya is LGBTQ+, if that matters ❤️
https://fedi.yesmap.net/system/media_attachments/files/113/931/984/145/679/786/original/f3ad5267895f7b02.png
https://fedi.yesmap.net/system/media_attachments/files/113/932/013/773/037/104/original/3553d0d467a233a0.png

2025-02-02 02:35:31 UTC

- reply

I'm literally a mod here lol