noderunner21
Node Runner

my node, my rules

Public Key

npub19l7gdnhpkaxt8rm2dp27d87rm589jgc70us06q2nmszt033wtzxqcwm7cy

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqszllyxemsmwn9n3a4xs40xnlpa6rjeyv087g8aq9facp9hcch93rqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqgjwaehxw309ac82unsd3jhqct89ejhxu8jahz

Publishing to

dev-relay.kube.b-n.space

offchain.pub

Author Public Key

npub19l7gdnhpkaxt8rm2dp27d87rm589jgc70us06q2nmszt033wtzxqcwm7cy

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-07-21 19:38:02 UTC

Oh yes, it is the extreme climate.
And definitely not the irresponsible money printing from governments all around the world.
https://blossom.primal.net/1ad5d56c9d9e2e9e5ee5d05265d06fbd0b3f5f3cff4add0aa3c070b0a3827a64.png

2025-07-10 17:20:21 UTC

- reply

now you need more than $1.13K to be a SATs millionaire

2025-06-30 21:15:20 UTC

- reply

Being a bitcoiner means standing up for Palestine when the entire world order is trying to suppress the genocide.

2025-06-23 19:40:16 UTC

- reply

who wants change vs who is willing to change

2025-06-23 19:36:41 UTC

- reply

you can't do offline payments with lightning, can you?
Plus, why do you ignore the development by Zeus, where you start with custodial ecash, but once you have a bigger stack, can transition to self-custody?
Why so much hate?

2025-06-19 18:48:27 UTC

- reply

there is no going back anymore 😄

2025-06-10 17:24:55 UTC

A controversial PR (linked below) is merged by the same Core maintainer who said the following in 2024:
"It's abundantly clear that this PR is controversial and, in its current state, has no hope of reaching a conclusion that is acceptable to everyone."
"At this point in time, I see no reason to leave this open and to continue to send notifications for the constant back-and-forth stalemate discussion."
https://blossom.primal.net/6afb07eb7f24158cdc4fa58feeb806e3d2a8cff4864707b90bf5af6fb2d28c8e.png
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32406 https://blossom.primal.net/82a9060476cccff7112a179812331b8afed47f1f3c96d9ccc911af5df50e8100.png

2025-06-09 17:58:33 UTC

- reply

Do you worry if today's controversial OP_RETURN PR merger is going to negatively affect the push to enable CTV + CSFS?

2025-06-09 17:54:43 UTC

- reply

how is this idea better than what Zeus is providing?
ecash for tiny amounts
recommendations to self-custody when it becomes a big chunck

2025-06-09 17:48:11 UTC

Bitcoin Core is working against the ethos of Bitcoin
And if this trend continues, you better believe Bitcoin will be ossified sooner than later. And with that, you can shove CTV + CSFS up your ass.
Don't bite the hand that feeds you, core devs.
https://youtu.be/sum71L7ej60

2025-06-09 17:00:54 UTC

- reply

what is the economic incentive to use OP_RETURN instead of witness or bare multisig?
OP_RETURN is objectively more expensive.

2025-06-06 17:02:10 UTC

- reply

OMG!
#nevent1q…j005

2025-06-06 16:59:43 UTC

- reply

That was 11 hours ago, bud

2025-06-06 16:59:15 UTC

- reply

The suits want your bitcoin
#nevent1q…pz76

2025-06-05 18:12:28 UTC

- reply

that low power device was running fine before 2023, and not lagging like it did recently.

2025-06-02 15:51:10 UTC

- reply

you are early because it has not been established as either medium of exchange or a unit of account.
Sure, we were late in not buying when it was in the hundreds, but you did beat the suits. 😉

2025-05-30 16:29:19 UTC

Nothing stops this train.

2025-05-29 16:49:36 UTC

- reply

Israel grabbing America by the pussy

2025-05-29 16:03:37 UTC

- reply

hey @nprofile…zkaf @nprofile…zj6n why walled garden.
please fight with @nprofile…zx3h ONLY on Nostr
#nevent1q…zn7g

2025-05-29 16:01:44 UTC

Why we need NOSTR!
https://www.yahoo.com/news/crypto-crime-spills-over-behind-040638613.html

2025-05-28 16:21:34 UTC

- reply

I like my seed phrase
#nevent1q…ng6s

2025-05-27 17:30:08 UTC

- reply

you do you while I stay humble and stack sats 😄

2025-05-27 17:17:57 UTC

- reply

lol the Bitcoin Conference is not a freedom tech conference.
You know the difference very well but keep on triggering people.
I should have known you were sold once you offered ETH in Casa.

2025-05-27 17:13:21 UTC

- reply

It was about damn time. Thanks @nprofile…wq2n @nprofile…zj6n
#nevent1q…yt43

2025-05-27 17:11:41 UTC

- reply

A general synopsis is that with 8Gb Pi4, I cannot add some other apps on my Umbrel OS on top of Core + Lightning + Electrum and some other apps like Jam, Mempool, Nostr relay and Pi-hole. Thats my point, a slow degradation that has made me upgrade to mini-PC within 4 years.
Rather than diving further in that aspect, what are core developers doing to resist or prevent further UTXO bloat?

2025-05-22 22:58:01 UTC

- reply

My thinking is as follows:
1. UTXO bloat (4 GB -> 12 GB in the last year?) has already increased the growth and hardware requirements (I had to replace my Pi4 8 GB)
2. Bitcoin core has done nothing to fight against it.
3. Now they want to invite more spammers and it's not going to help with Problem1 because it is financially wise to put data in witness than OP_RETURN.

2025-05-22 17:26:23 UTC

- reply

he doesn't know sats the standard so much needed

2025-05-22 16:13:46 UTC

- reply

I mean Gresham's law is also true
You save undervalued assets and spend overvalued ones.
And it is true. Btc is undervalued and dollar is overvalued.
But we need to push the movement for sure.

2025-05-20 19:46:10 UTC

- reply

who the hell knows

2025-05-20 18:59:55 UTC

- reply

great, thanks and you too
at least we agree on Nostr 😃

2025-05-20 18:31:08 UTC

- reply

Whatever floats your boat man.
You started by saying for a currency we need the smallest base unit that is not further divisible, and the likes of Jack and you want to call it "Bitcoin".
As a counter example, I said L2 further divides the base unit, which I call "sats" into "millisats", so my question is, where you draw the line of redefining the base unit? As I said, Bitcoin is deflationary currency so, in 100 years, what happens when we need micro-sats in L2?
I'll give you my main summary.
My point is the base unit is Bitcoin, and there is 21 million of them. You can divide it to smaller units as you want (L2, L3, maybe even soft fork L1). You can call it sats, bits, micro-sats, micro-bits, etc. Giving your example, your height is 1.90m /190 cm. You can even call it 1,900mm or 1,900,00 um etc. What you cannot do is redefine the units and say your height is 190 m, and that is the crux of the matter.
In regards to using as medium of exchange, it depends on the size of the transaction. For a house price, you'll say it costs 4 bitcoin, not 400,000,000 sats. And for a milk, you'll say its costs 400 sats not 0.00000400 btc. The human mind will adopt to the correct size designation, like we use for length scale (lightyears), mass scale (amu) and time scale measurements (millenia).
At this point, I am done discussing this matter any further, as its clear we have agreed to disagree.

2025-05-20 16:45:58 UTC

- reply

> Half-penny and paisa were in common circulation until inflation wiped it out. cents and dimes will also go away as well given the rate of dollar inflation.
> Try changing the 21Million cap and you will see that no nodes will accept it: no one wants to willingly dilute their worth. That is what I mean by Bitcoin's global truth.
Bitcoin is a deflationary currency. What happens when we need units smaller than one sat? For instance, Lightning uses milli-sats. What happens to the base money then, just keep redefining the base unit? Your reductionist viewpoint doesn't bode well.

2025-05-19 21:38:21 UTC

- reply

nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqtlusm8wrd6vkw8k56z4u60u8hgwty33uleql5q48hqyklrzukyvqyv8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnnv4kkjum0dshxgetk9uq3xamnwvaz7tm0venxx6rpd9hzuur4vghszymhwden5te0wp6hyurvv4cxzeewv4ej7qpqlc0u003vwvgd8zpvkufrn288y3hwyx37rkafwu4p8zdf7lwqef2q2fn0ye

2025-05-19 21:33:43 UTC

- reply

No, I think they started by being seed oil disrespector before becoming bitcoiner

2025-05-19 21:32:49 UTC

- reply

There is hope for America. Love you, Senator Lummis.

2025-05-19 17:26:54 UTC

- reply

I like how how you brought quantum physics into discussion.
In that case, let me bring the analogy of relativity, and compare bitcoin with speed of light, c. Bitcoin's global truth is 21 Million bitcoin. Anything else is arbitrary.
And like I mentioned earlier, you cherry pick parts you like, and ignore what you don't. see below:
> There were half-pennies in circulation in 1800s. Check Lyn Alden's Broken money.
> Rupees have smaller units called paisa. 100 paisa = 1 rupees.

2025-05-19 17:03:10 UTC

- reply

No, you are again using one truth to guide towards false claims.
The SI unit of length is meters, i.e., the base unit. Angstroem is 10^-10 of the base unit.
1 meter = 10,000,000,000 Angstrom doesn't mean base unit is Angstroem.

2025-05-19 16:33:53 UTC

- reply

all these big words, but what's your point?
I clearly gave you a unit ratio comparison with word-pair that you say shouldn't exist in real world: Angstrom to meter. But you completely ignore it.
Within the term rupees, I gave you examples of lakhs (10^5) and crores (10^7).
So just like 10crores = 10,000,000 rupees, 1 bitcoin = 10,000,000 sats.

2025-05-19 16:00:19 UTC

- reply

lol I just gave you the example with Angstroem and Meter. (Ratio of 1:10,000,000,000)
You can call MegaSats, KiloSats, just like there is milliSats in lightning.
And if you are worried by 8 zeroes instead of 9, go study eastern culture where they use Lakhs and Crores with even spaces (2 units).
Stop shoving your naive take.

2025-05-19 15:41:14 UTC

- reply

Drop the Angstroem. Just meter. It's cleaner.
The feature size of the next gen chip goes from 1.4 Angstroem to 1.4 meters. Do you see how stupid that sounds?

2025-05-16 20:43:39 UTC

- reply

Drop the dollar. Just cents. It's cleaner.

2025-05-16 20:33:07 UTC

- reply

i'm here for it

2025-05-16 20:32:36 UTC

- reply

team nostr only

2025-05-14 18:55:52 UTC

- reply

after listening to Shinobi and Mechanic, whom do you agree more with? @nprofile…2vts
For me one thing was for sure, Shinobi was condescending and calling us stupid. He commented saying who the hell are we to decide what is spam. But who is he to tell me what goes in my node?

2025-05-13 17:38:55 UTC

- reply

"Spam" is subjective and defined by the RECEIVER. So, as a node runner, I do NOT want to relay non-monetary transactions, and I believe I should have the right to configure that.
What goes into the blockchain is OBVIOUSLY different than what goes on to my mempool, and what I want to relay. Of course I cannot stop that, but at least my mempool is sending a signal that I do not promote nor relay non-monetary transactions.

2025-05-13 17:33:02 UTC

- reply

my node, my rules

2025-05-12 20:30:31 UTC

- reply

why are they going to OP_RETURN when they can get 4x witness discount?
If we were to succumb to miners we would have had Segwit2x.

2025-05-12 18:29:30 UTC

- reply

Finally some sense,
Nodes prevail 🔥 🔥 🔥

2025-05-12 18:14:33 UTC

- reply

lol go lie some other gullible people.

2025-05-12 17:49:00 UTC

I believe the bitcoin OGs from 2010-20 era are NOT much concerned about the current OP_RETURN debate because they have a fat UTXO; so, if there is an increased demand for the block space with non-monetary transactions, they will still be able to spend the UTXO without paying huge portion in fees.
However, recent bitcoiners have smaller UTXOs, and not filtering for non-monetary transactions can and will directly impact their ability to transact on-chain.

2025-05-12 15:26:57 UTC

- reply

You are trying to smear Luke's credibility
while at the same time denying conflict of interest in the OP_RETURN debate, given we all know your vested financial interest in Citrea.
#nevent1q…d7ly

2025-05-12 15:23:45 UTC

- reply

lol ignore Todd
That guy is just salty he sold half of his stack 10 years ago

2025-05-12 15:22:32 UTC

- reply

but given your vested financial interest in Citra
you definitely do NOT have conflict of interest in the current debate.

2025-05-09 22:43:17 UTC

- reply

yes we do!!!

2025-05-01 17:59:26 UTC

- reply

that doesn't mean we should make it easier and cheaper for spam attack.
Should email not have spam filters?

2025-05-01 16:52:17 UTC

- reply

I'm sorry, but your team funds OpenSats and Ten31; you cannot just be an NPC on this.
I've noticed that many core developers have their own Bitcoin products, giving them a vested financial interest in enabling certain features. How do you manage conflicts of interest when making decisions to support developers?

2025-04-30 17:34:46 UTC

- reply

I don't see an XMR pack
lmao

2025-04-30 17:19:41 UTC

- reply

is he talking about the OP_RETURN discussion
or is this related with Nostr?

2025-04-30 16:57:05 UTC

- reply

lol cry harder