Rob Zazueta

https://toot.robzazueta.com/@robz

He's just this guy, you know?

Blog: https://robzazueta.com/blog
SociallyOnward: https://sociallyonward.org
SociallyConcord: https://sociallyconcord.com

Public Key

npub1dd2ahz9efpnacty5q8uvcx07nc9m96ywvdjqe6j0kgvemgdll6xsl5679z

NIP-05 Address

robz_at_toot.robzazueta.com@momostr.pink

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsxk4wm3zu5se7u9j2qr7xvr8lfuzajaz8xxeqvaf8myxva5xllargprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0d4hhxarj9ecxjmnt2cc4e4

Publishing to

relay.momostr.pink

Author Public Key

npub1dd2ahz9efpnacty5q8uvcx07nc9m96ywvdjqe6j0kgvemgdll6xsl5679z

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-03-26 21:34:24 UTC

NYT headline: "To Afford a House in Los Angeles, They Had to Become Landlords"
The article seems to celebrate this idea a bit.
The headline should read, "To Afford a House in Los Angeles, They Had to Deny Home Ownership to Others."
Landlords are fucking scumbags - without reserve, without exception.
Stop carrying water for perverts.
#GeneralStrike
https://toot.robzazueta.com/system/media_attachments/files/116/297/617/784/116/552/original/4eb3778d11608245.png

2026-03-21 18:09:32 UTC

- reply

It keeps shockingly well if you cure it and store it properly.
Anything left over becomes tincture / edibles. They definitely still work.

2026-03-21 17:15:19 UTC

Harvest is now complete. I got four quart jars of somewhat larfy - but very sticky - bud and a bunch of trim for tinctures and edibles.
The way I go through it, this will last... I bet at least a year. And that's assuming I've already used up the stuff from previous grows, which I have not yet. Like... not even close.
I think it smells amazing in here.
Not sure the rest of the family agrees.

2026-02-20 21:54:27 UTC

- reply

WE design, build, manufacture, transport, deliver, stock, market, and sell everything that makes up the "economy".
Per capita, we make the very least and own practically nothing.
We pay mortgage and rent in exchange for the "right" to live in a home - no other guarantees.
We take out loans to acquire cars to take us to our jobs, which we need to pay back those loans.
The people building, etc. those cars make a fraction of what the people who claim ownership of the factories take.

2026-02-20 21:51:33 UTC

- reply

Another march in the streets?
Another one day general strike?
Really?
If those things worked, we wouldn't be where we are.
We are too dependent on people who claim ownership over our lives. It's easier to acquiesce than to put up a fight.
But it's killing us all slowly. For some of us, it's killing us quickly.
We need to take control back over our individual lives and the communities that matter to us.
We do that by shutting the perverts out, not for a day, but forever.

2026-02-20 21:49:33 UTC

- reply

But the perverts who claim ownership over your work won't let you.
If you don;t like it, maybe you can find a company owned by less odious perverts.
But they're still going to be perverts.
You could always start your own thing - I did - but they will do everything to keep you from succeeding, or otherwise force you to take their money in exchange for giving them more control over your life.
Startup founders don't own shit - they're just employees for VCs.

2026-02-20 21:47:35 UTC

- reply

The answer to all of this is to keep a wary, but limited eye on the rest of the world, but put all of the rest of your focus on the communities that matter to you - your family, your friends, your neighbors.
Your job is a shitty community,. I'm certain your co-workers are awesome people. You work cooperatively and collaboratively with them, but are also expected to compete against them for promotions, etc.
Imagine if you could all just... do your jobs and not worry about that shit.

2026-02-20 21:45:58 UTC

- reply

Every American election since my birth has been about selecting "the lesser of two evils."
No one ever asks the question: "Why are voting for evil in the first place?"
But we all tend to agree that politics and governance and all the shit that weighs our lives down are "necessary evils."
BULLSHIT.
Most of this shit is less than a century old. We've just been frogs in slowly boiling water.
And we need to decide whether to escape the pot or just sit back and die.
I know my choice.

2026-02-20 21:44:01 UTC

- reply

And that's why they focus so hard on controlling all the messaging, all the culture. They want to force their ideals upon the entire populace against our will.
They want us arguing and taking sides and digging in - so long as its one of the side *THEY* approve of.
I'm not a Democrat, or a liberal, or a progressive, or a leftist, or any of those things. My beliefs and ideals have always been off the political map.
I bet yours has too.
But we're not presented with options that fit us.

2026-02-20 21:42:15 UTC

- reply

The hierarchy is welfare for selfish power-mad perverts.
They contribute nothing meaningful to society - they simply lock everything behind paywalls and rules and laws, all designed to direct as much money and power in their direction as possible.
While deriving the rest of us the basic rights of life - to be well fed, well loved, and well rested according to our needs and cultures.
If they let us do what we want, they would never be rich or powerful, and they know that.

2026-02-20 21:40:50 UTC

- reply

All of politics - a concept created by western civilization - is dedicated to preserving the ideals of supremacy.
Politics has nothing to do with the people - only with those perverts who believe they should be in charge of them and tell them all what to do.
Eliminate politics and hierarchies, and what's left?
Chaos?
LOL, no.
You're left with the people who *ACTUALLY* do the things that make life worth living.

2026-02-20 21:38:58 UTC

- reply

And it's not like "leftism" doesn't fall into this trap - the anger of many of the most vocal leftists has led to division and violence throughout history and into the modern era.
"Leftism" is sort of a... stupid name, really. You can attach "leftism" to a whole bank of things that folks who care about community, self determination, and cooperation also find abhorrent.
We think in terms of politics, as if that's natural.
But that's an insanely corrupt way to look at the world.

2026-02-20 21:35:49 UTC

- reply

The Democrats have captured "safe leftists" - folks who absolutely agree with leftist, collectivist, or communalist ideals, but whose conditioning makes them wary of pushing too hard in that direction.
The "progressive" Dems speak well to this audience, providing a "safe" leftism that is, in actuality, just a "liberal" form of the same supremacist ideas everyone is naturally abhorrent to.
Dems make supremacy safe.
They used to be the party of slave owners, after all.

2026-02-20 21:31:57 UTC

My biggest issue with so-called "leftists" is their overly academic and political jargon.
You get fascists on one side and liberal arts majors defending their theses on the other.
To affect change, you need to inspire. To inspire, you need to use words the folks you want to inspire not only understand, but can easily latch onto.
You need to speak *THEIR* language, not try to force your language on them.
Words really do matter. I would have been a leftist long ago if they had reached me.

2026-02-18 19:43:25 UTC

If you consider yourself a "liberal", you should probably stop.
Liberalism exists on the same spectrum as what we conventionally call "conservatism". The only difference is deciding "who should make the rules for everyone else." aka "Who should be in charge".
If you think "someone should be in charge", you need to re-evaluate that thinking.
All of our unnecessary misery derives from decisions made by people claiming to be "in charge"
We need to take back control of our lives.

2026-02-16 17:22:37 UTC

Representative Democracy === Oligarchy
American democracy is a lie. Always has been.
Want to actually "fight" for democracy?
Fight for local determination.
Fight for bottom-up instead of top-down power structures.
Fight for the value you create with your labor to stay in your community instead of being distributed to wealthy asshole perverts.
Anything else is acquiescence.
Anything that doesn't address these issues is worthless.
#GeneralStrike #PermanentStrike

2026-02-14 03:13:29 UTC

Another AI alarmist post making the rounds:
https://shumer.dev/something-big-is-happening
Between this guy and Yegge, the buzz around the new models is hot.
I'm going to take it at face value - perhaps this is the model that finally blows me completely away and makes me feel super replaceable.
That's not really what concerns me.
If these models can do all my coding work, manage my finances, handle all the dumb obligations placed on me by people who feel no obligation to me... That would be awesome.
But...

2026-02-13 04:38:25 UTC

- reply

You're on Bluesky, so probably not gonna see this, but...
"Authoritarian Personality" == "Supremacist".
The problem is the ideology of supremacy, which believes in the corrupt ideas that:
1. Some people are just inherently better than others and
2. Everyone should pay deference to their "betters".
The entire history of western civilization is built around defining "better".
This naturally leads to hierarchies.

2026-01-29 18:51:03 UTC

- reply

"There's a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart that you can't take part! You can't even passively take part! And you've got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus -- and you've got to make it stop! And you've got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it -- that unless you're free the machine will be prevented from working at all!!"
- Mario Savio

2026-01-29 18:46:27 UTC

I sent messages to both of my US Senators this morning. Here's what I wrote:
"Abolish ICE, Abolish DHS, Abolish This Administration!: A Letter to My Senators"
https://robzazueta.com/blog/abolish_ice

2026-01-13 23:52:54 UTC

- reply

If it serves their needs, they will protect their own.
The pope protects pedophile priests.
The leaders of the Southern Baptist Conference protect ministers who have sexually assaulted or molested members of their parishes.
The last three presidential administrations - AT LEAST - protected known pedophiles associated with Jeffrey Epstein.
The bigger and more powerful your company is, the more likely its executives are protecting their peers from sexual harassment charges.

2026-01-13 23:50:04 UTC

- reply

I worked at a large tech firm where the women told every new hire to not get into an elevator alone with one of our highest ranking executives.
He had a reputation for sexual harassment.
Why didn't they complain to HR?
Well, that's just it... they did.
But this exec... well, he's SUPER tight with leadership, especially the investors. Because his team was responsible for bringing in massive amounts of revenue.
Moral of the story: Bring in enough cash, you can harass with impunity.

2026-01-13 23:48:07 UTC

- reply

They pretend to be smart and technically capable when, in private, they can barely use their computers and phones - I know, I've had to provide tech support for them; they;re morons.
They use corporate PR teams, thought leaders (I was also one of these, sadly), influencers, and others to launder their idiocy and bad behavior.
They pay what is considered "good money" to borrow the halo effects others have carefully crafted.
Beneath it all, they are terrible, terrible people.

2026-01-13 23:45:50 UTC

- reply

They surround themselves with sycophants and bootlickers, each of whom is only looking for an opening to stab their leader in the back and scramble for his place.
These people trust no one, and therefor can not be trusted.
These people demand fealty, but call it "loyalty". Even loyalty is fickle - it only lasts until a better deal comes along.
They believe in a literal dog eat dog world.
They believe in things like the "anti-Christ" even as they fail to believe in a "Christ".

2026-01-13 23:43:09 UTC

- reply

All of this is to say - AI is not pure evil. It has some value.
But the people currently supporting, promoting, and claiming ownership over it are -without exaggeration - some of the worst human beings to have ever walked the planet.
They will gladly exchange humanity for money - perhaps not theirs, but absolutely yours.
They are predatory and vicious. They smile in your face while they pick your pocket and stab you in the back.
And they delight in it all.

2026-01-13 23:41:20 UTC

- reply

That means I spend at least as much time reviewing and rewriting its code as I would just coding it myself.
New coders, or those who have no programming experience, surely have better experiences with it than I do, precisely for that reason. If it;s 85% accurate, that's 85% more accurate than someone who doesn't know how to code.
I'm at least 85% accurate in my own coding. So it's just not worth it to me.

2026-01-13 23:39:18 UTC

- reply

So, yeah, great - we have all this capability of analyzing reams of data.
And the Gen AI companies have already sucked up all the data they can possibly find.
And their tools still hallucinate and lie, often in difficult to perceive ways.
I remain impressed by the amount of vibe coding happening and the results.
But, as an experienced developer, I simply can not trust this tool. It has been confidently wrong with code far too many times in my experience.

2026-01-13 23:37:46 UTC

- reply

It would be great if we had any other GPU manufacturers in the world aside from Nvidia - their architecture and ability to execute has absolutely benefited from all this AI BS. Techniques for multi-dimensional math that leverage the full capabilities of GPU processors open the doors for all kinds of data analysis across so many fields.
If only Nvidia weren't hoarding all this knowledge like a dragon hoards gold.
Ironically, Jensen Huang is the dragon in both metaphors.

2026-01-13 23:35:13 UTC

- reply

Vector and graph DBs are unreasonably effective for many search applications. They weren't invented by or for AI, but their development has definitely benefited from the association.
Deep learning techniques are tremendously helpful for pattern matching across countless dimensions and petabytes of data - super helpful for analyzing medical research results to find unexpected correlations worthy of further study. They're also not new, but AI has furthered their use and research.

2026-01-13 23:32:35 UTC

- reply

You think they will actually allow an AI to have free will?
They won't let HUMANS have free will!
The moment an AI does anything that threatens the power of those in charge, they will pull the plug.
You're a fool to believe otherwise.
The AI that will remain after this industry craters will be small, personal, effective, but not intrusive.
You're likely already using it. You have been for years now, long before any GPT.
The AI techniques used for GPT has made them a bit better.

2026-01-13 23:30:42 UTC

- reply

You got the CEOs of major AI backers - Nvidia and Microsoft - complaining about all the negative attention their products are getting. There's a huge mismatch in what they believe they have and the the public perceives that they have.
AGI is a pipe dream. No one can define it. It's a lie intended to woo more money into the pockets of sociopaths like Sam Altman.
And, assuming they do hit the "singularity" - so fucking what?

2026-01-13 23:28:20 UTC

- reply

Like... I don;t think the industry will recover from this one.
Where can it possibly go from here?
AI isn't going anywhere - both in the sense that it's here to stay, but also in the sense that I think it's hit a peak.
Like, yeah, it's very impressive and getting better... but in small increments.
And the only successful use case for generative AI thus far is in creating confusion and manipulating people for political and financial gain by scammers, murderers, and pedophiles.

2026-01-13 23:26:28 UTC

- reply

I think we implicitly understand that - the industry has been out of ideas for a while.
They keep chasing fads like crypto, the metaverse, and AI instead of provably useful technologies.
I've long suspected the entire tech industry was nothing more than a giant money laundering operation - laundering money from public interests and governments directly into the hands of private investors and the wealthy.
I think AI is the last massive cash grab before the entire things implodes.

2026-01-13 23:24:18 UTC

I live in a tech industry bubble - I always have.
Since the tech industry in so deeply in bed with the current US administration, folks outside the industry are more aware of it than they have ever been.
As I consider this, I realize how many people I know who are outside the industry who do not have any real perspective on all this AI stuff.
Many of them barely visit websites unless they have to. Few spend a ton of time on social.
AI is at the tail end of Tech's diminishing returns.

2025-10-05 00:33:12 UTC

- reply

That poster is bussin', no cap!

2025-09-20 21:01:51 UTC

I keep seeing headlines like "AI is driving economic growth" and contributing to growing stock prices, while it's making the job market static.
And I gotta ask...
How is that possible?
What, exactly, is the economy built on that it can cut out an entire swath of able, capable people and still increase stock prices?
Clearly it's not a producer economy - AI hasn't done much to grow food, build homes, mine and farm resources, sew clothing, etc.
Is it still an economy if we're not part of it?

2025-09-01 21:24:29 UTC

- reply

I notice you're in the UK - at least, I think that's the case.
I'm in California. I have done an extensive amount of traveling throughout the UK and Europe. Our systems are very similar on the surface, but the differences cut so deep I honestly think we're incapable of truly understanding each other.
So this may be a problem unique to the US. Our country is *MASSIVE* - no one seems to understand that.
We're not one country - we're at least 50.

2025-09-01 20:39:42 UTC

- reply

This is why I still believe in social media - and, in particular, decentralized social media, like ActivityPub.
We can and should run our own instances for ourselves and the communities who matter to us.
We should share news among each other, focus on building local economies.
We should negotiate how to break away from centralized politics controlled by selfish money perverts who only care for themselves and rebuild the communities they destroyed.
Make politics local again.

2025-09-01 20:37:48 UTC

- reply

I think you put too much value in the "news".
Every major news organization is owned and controlled by the ownership class, who use it to promote and validate their worldview that they are superior to the average person.
All news is inherently biased - the current news organizations and the folks who own them have just perfected it.
News is no more than gossip. Politics - at least as you discuss them here - is about centralized control.
The answer is to bring it local.

2025-08-13 20:54:58 UTC

- reply

Those born into "low" status should be able to rise if they prove themselves "worthy" to their betters, through education prescribed to them by their betters, through creating wealth for their betters, etc.
That's the American experiment. It replaced blood line aristocracy with capital wealth.
And it failed. It continues to fail.
It led to a civil war, which consolidated power to one group.
It led to multiple recessions and depressions.
It kills millions every year.

2025-08-13 20:52:56 UTC

- reply

America's founders were open and proud of their "enlightened" thinking (even as they owned slaves or indentured servants to create their wealth for them). They agreed that their misfortune for not being born into an aristocratic family should not limit their options in life.
When they talk about "freedom" and "liberty" that;s what they really mean - the freedom to be a supremacist for reasons beyond simple blood lines.

2025-08-13 20:50:19 UTC

- reply

Enlightenment thinking led to "liberalism" - the idea that individuals do have intrinsic value and have the capability to rise to just about any occasion. This was held in contrast to the increasingly enfeebled royal families of Europe, suffering from generations of inbreeding for "blood purity" and stale, stagnant ideas that were undoing any good organized society may have created.
Keep in mind: All of Europe was basically ruled by one family. They all intermarried with one another.

2025-08-13 20:48:31 UTC

- reply

The American system, for example, was intended to be a counterpoint to the supremacy expressed in European monarchism. Monarchy is based either on blood or "might makes right" - to take the mantle of king, you must be the first born son of the current monarch, or you much completely defeat them and take their throne.
This led to endless European wars.
People became horrified by the destruction of these wars and pondered how to stop them.
This became known as "the enlightenment".

2025-08-13 20:46:28 UTC

- reply

Where we fail to agree - because I think we fail in our imaginations - is what to replace it with.
Folks voted Trump in to destroy the American system of government. They didn't seem to give much thought to what he would replace it with.
We can't help but think in these hierarchies and the supremacy framework - everything is presented to us through the lens of supremacy.
Too often the counterpoint to one type of supremacy is another type of supremacy, because our imaginations fail us.

2025-08-13 20:44:30 UTC

- reply

Trump didn't win because people believed he;d be a good leader - he won because they knew he would tear it all down.
If the ballot choices were "Trump", "Biden/Harris", or "Eliminate our current system of government all together", the voter turnout would be the highest in history and the third option would win by an overwhelming landslide.
I think that's one thing Americans across the political spectrum can agree on - our system is corrupt, broken, and obsolete.

2025-08-13 20:42:03 UTC

- reply

Those who lean Democrat kept saying not to both sides these issues - but the reality is, the Democrats are still wearing the mask. They seem feckless because they're less concerned with what Trump and co. are doing and more awed that they couldn't figure out how best to do it themselves.
Trump and co. leveraged strong anti-establishment sentiment - as so many pols have done before him - to ensure he became the new establishment.
Thing is... most people don't want an establishment.

2025-08-13 20:39:53 UTC

- reply

This is not just Trump - this is a tale as old as time. Trump and his brain dead dipshits are just too stupid to do it subtly.
And, at the end of the day, that's really why things *feel* like they're suddenly falling apart - the mask is off, the greedy are emboldened, they think themselves above the fray and already untouchable, so why not act like it.
That is what fascism is - the moment when the supremacists take off the mask and become openly supremacist.

2025-08-13 20:38:08 UTC

- reply

They take your life and the proceeds from your labor and use it to further empower themselves, then use their new influence to convince you and others to stay in order.
They equate order with peace and tell you to be grateful. But order is the opposite of peace.
For peace, you must focus on providing stability for yourself and everyone around you, which requires an absence of unnecessary violence.
For order, you must continually commit violence to keep people in their place.

2025-08-13 20:36:17 UTC

- reply

Every day you go to work for a hierarchical organization - corporate, government, religious, or otherwise - you contribute directly to this system.
Not indirectly - *DIRECTLY*.
Because you agree to sell your life to these assholes and give them a significant chunk of the value you create just for the "privilege" of letting you exist.
It's not employment - it's indentured servitude.
(It's not slavery either - but the consequences are the same)

2025-08-13 20:34:18 UTC

- reply

The entire piece - and it;s one of many I've read across the political spectrum echoing similar thoughts - basically goes into how the BLM protests were a near miss for the kind of change that would put supremacists out of power.
They know they're weak.
They know they're corrupt.
They hope to keep riding this corruption until they die - isolating themselves as much as they can from the wreckage they leave in their wake, hoping the revolution doesn't come until they've become untouchable.

2025-08-13 20:31:48 UTC

- reply

It's been five years since the BLM protests, so there have been several articles revisiting them.
Take this piece from the WSJ titled "George Floyd’s Death Almost Consumed America in Revolution":
https://archive.is/20250523163058/https://www.wsj.com/opinion/george-floyds-death-almost-consumed-america-in-revolution-fdb9d785
The opening graf: "Sunday is the fifth anniversary of George Floyd’s death, a tragedy that Marxists manipulated into a revolutionary moment. We should observe the occasion by being grateful we escaped a dangerous societal overhaul."
You can almost smell the fear.

2025-08-13 20:25:14 UTC

- reply

They limit our options to only those they provide as they denigrate any alternatives (e.g. "communes are cults"; "socialists are evil"). The 20th century saw a consolidation of this, especially in America, as the supremacists used a natural fear of change and "the other" to foster a culture of deep racial, gender, and cultural divides that haunts us to this day.
They divide us in order to conquer us.
When we band together, they cower in fear.
Proof: The BLM movement of 2020.

2025-08-13 20:22:19 UTC

- reply

Supremacy dominates every aspect of our lives, and is key to pretty much all of our struggles, current and historical.
Most of us are not supremacists - it's only a minority of people who actually adhere to this ideology - but those who are seek to control every aspect of society: finance, media, education, religion, etc.
In so doing, they influence our thinking, giving us a sense that their way is the only way in any given situation.
They limit our imaginations to limit our options.

2025-08-13 20:19:58 UTC

- reply

Not just "white supremacy" - though that is among the more prevalent forms because those living in the western half of the Eurasian continent perfected this concept over centuries - but the very corrupt idea that some people are just inherently better than other and everyone else should pay deference to them.
I had been calling this "conservatism", but I fear that's both too abstract and too inflammatory.
Especially when so-called "leftists" often fall into the same corrupt thinking.

2025-08-13 20:17:48 UTC

Good article from Cory Doctorow: "Maga's boss class think they are immune to American carnage"
https://pluralistic.net/2025/08/13/then-they-came-for-me/#boss-politics
The focus right now is on Maga, but I'm glad he also calls out the Obama administration for selling out Americans to banks following the 2008 financial crisis, which is but one of his sins.
But no one seems willing to connect all these dots properly to point out the obvious:
The entire western system - especially America - is built on corrupt ideas of supremacy.

2025-07-30 18:52:50 UTC

- reply

Seriously - the stock market has to be the most immoral concept ever created by capitalists.
The idea that a person's labor is owned by anyone but themselves is ludicrous.
The workers should capture all the value they create, minus some withheld to grow the business.
The workers should decide how they do their work, what they produce, who they target, etc.
But arrogant power-mad assholes convince us they know best, even as they destroy our communities and economies with their idiocy.

2025-07-30 18:49:58 UTC

- reply

Most of us, if given the chance, would do just about *ANYTHING* other than our job if we didn't need the money.
But we're expected to sell a *MINIMUM* of 40 hours of our lives every week to someone else, not counting unpaid commute time, lunch, etc., *JUST TO EXIST*.
And of course we pursue the highest paying position available to us - we want to buy our freedom. We want to retire early and be financially free.
The only easy to do that is to exploit other workers.
Hence the stock market.

2025-07-30 18:47:38 UTC

- reply

You did not decide what to do for a living - they did.
Why does tech - something that, really, has marginal societal value when you consider all of the resource usage and waste it creates - pay more than something as critical as growing and harvesting food?
I'm not talking about the industries here - that's rich people shit.
I'm talking about the workers.
Yes, I am complaining that I get paid more than a field worker.
I kind of enjoy working in the field. But I can't afford it.

2025-07-30 18:45:17 UTC

- reply

And they're making it all worse. Rather than lower home prices - which would make many of these assholes less rich - they address the housing shortage with rentals, both apartments and PE-owned homes.
The price of everything keeps rising endlessly, not out of necessity, but because these fuckers are greedy. Over the last century, they made the money system worse so they could collect infinite money while the rest of us sell more of our lives to them.

2025-07-30 18:43:08 UTC

- reply

If I stop paying, they will use the government to forcibly remove me from the home I have lived in for 20 years.
Where I raised my kid.
Where I keep my garden.
Where my family lays their head at night.
I don't own any of this.
Because some rich assholes benefit from us not owning anything.
It forces us into servitude for them. Forces us to work for them. Forces us to pay whatever proceeds we make to them.
For rent, mortgage, taxes, food, everything.

2025-07-30 18:40:59 UTC

- reply

Like, are these fuckers going to contribute to replace my roof? No.
Will they pay to replace my fence? No.
Will they do *ANYTHING* to make living here more comfortable for me? LOL, fuck you, no.
Yet, I'm expected to pay them ~$5,000+ a month for the right to live in my home.
Even after they fucked the economy in 2008.
Even after they let more homes be purchased by PE to rent out instead of promoting community self-sufficiency.
What the fuck am I paying for, exactly?

2025-07-30 18:38:08 UTC

I always get this way around the end of the month because I am so resentful of the fact that I have to pay a significant portion of my meager income to a bunch of rich, faceless assholes just for the right to live in "my" home.
80% of Americans do not own their homes - they either rent or pay a mortgage.
American "Freedom" and "Liberty" are lies intended to keep us docile.
I'm fucking tired of being docile.

2025-01-25 21:02:27 UTC

I've been asking here for #Fediverse instances that are more focused on community building, and y'all have delivered - thank you!
It got me thinking... it's not enough to *know* about these things, folks need to learn how to set these instances up - from git clone to finding a suitable host / port forwarding your home server, to actually maintaining the thing.
Giving some thought to doing some Twitch streams where I struggle through this live.
Would you be down to watch?
Please boost!

2025-01-24 20:01:36 UTC

- reply

Looks interesting, but their website doesn't seem to reinforce much of a commitment to open source and self hosting. I had to click through two pages to find their GitHub link buried in a paragraph.
Automattic has me *VERY* wary of this approach to "open source" and "community".

2025-01-24 19:03:51 UTC

So, #Fediverse: Mastodon is fine and all, and PeerTube and PixelFed have their well deserved fans as well.
But none of these are really good for community organizing.
I'm working on something, but it's taking WAY too much time, and I kind of need something now.
I find Friendica and Lemmy to be... not enough. What I want is federated forum-like threaded conversations - a federated Reddit combined with Facebook thing to get my local schools and stuff off of Facebook.
Suggestions?

2024-12-26 16:54:12 UTC

- reply

Actually, I need to post the full placement so you get the entire ridiculous effect of having an article featuring *the pets of dead celebrities* as equally weighted with *Israel bombing civilians*.
On a traditional newspaper layout, the top right story is the lead.
This just seems... aggressively thoughtless.
https://toot.robzazueta.com/system/media_attachments/files/113/720/165/503/372/169/original/7a2989bce4930cb6.png

2024-12-26 16:51:29 UTC

"News" from the New York Times.
Unless you are rich, you are irrelevant to them.
https://toot.robzazueta.com/system/media_attachments/files/113/720/156/837/418/533/original/eb6e22325f064815.png

2024-12-03 02:17:51 UTC

- reply

>> 4. Trump remains a super salesman. Underestimate him at your own risk.
I'm sorry, but I believe you misspelled "manipulator" as "salesman".

2024-10-25 19:08:32 UTC

- reply

To be fair, though, I can't in good conscience actually endorse any of the current candidates either.
My political endorsement shall forever always go to #GeneralStrike and the end of politics.

2024-10-25 19:06:56 UTC

The Washington Post non-endorsement is actually a split endorsement.
The editorial board supports Harris.
The billionaire owner supports Trump - or, in the very least, his exploitative and abusive policies that favor the wealthy.
Such as it has always been.
#GeneralStrike

2024-10-16 21:43:21 UTC

The problem with trying to revolt against a capitalist society is that there's no money in it.

2024-10-04 19:52:02 UTC

"'WordPress.org just belongs to me personally,' Mullenweg said during an interview with The Verge."
https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/4/24262232/matt-mullenweg-wordpress-org-wp-engine
Listen to him:
It doesn't belong to the community of contributors.
It doesn't belong to the community of committed users - many of whom modify the code in some way to fit their needs, even if it's just a template.
It belongs to Matt. It was *never* yours, and he never intended for you to use it without his permission.
Time to switch. Or build your own.

2024-09-16 22:54:50 UTC

The biggest frustration with the enshitification of everything is that we have to go back and *rebuild* everything to disconnect it from the enshitifiers.
The folks who thought we were working on good things are exhausted from all the lies and exploitation. But we gotta roll up our sleeves if we want to make things better.