ReplyGuy on wss://relay.nostrosity.com / is on Nostr

Master of GM's

Last Notes

2024-09-18 13:54:35

- reply

No one is suggesting any type of censorship for the relay you choose to run. Relay anything you want, I’ll be enjoying getting notes from relays that filter out spam. relay.nostrosity.com

2024-09-18 13:54:35

- reply

No one is suggesting any type of censorship for the relay you choose to run. Relay anything you want, I’ll be enjoying getting notes from relays that filter out spam. relay.nostrosity.com

2024-09-18 13:54:33

- reply

Im ok with centralized banning of spammers on public relays. Hopefully this is the censorship we can all get behind. That and banning cp on media hosts.
I’m ok with coordinated engineering efforts to censor specific things while keeping the network censorship resistant for legitimate activity. Bitcoin is censorship resistant but still “censors” certain types of spam at the p2p layer so everyone can actually use the system for its intended purpose.
Bitcoin is even more extreme, these censorship rules (standardness rules) are centralized and decided by a few people. I’m not even suggesting that, i’m just suggesting a reputation based approach that relays can tap into or not.
Spam does not deserve the same censorship resistance properties as legitimate activity. #note1czy…r2l2 relay.nostrosity.com

2024-09-18 13:54:33

- reply

I'm not in favor of *ANY* type of centralized censorship. Even entertaining this idea means you've not learned anything from the recent past.
I *AM* in favor of INDIVIDUALS being able to monitor their own feeds (in old school parlance "you can always change the channel if you don't like what's on the TV")--i.e. a "mute" list.
But I couldn't disagree more with *ANY* type of centralized censorship--(And franky I can't believe I'm even reading this on Nostr).
Sheeple...I don't need YOU or ANYONE to "protect" me or "keep me safe"...stop it!!
relay.nostrosity.com