mcc

glitch girl

pronouns: she/her
main project: https://mermaid.industries
on bsky: https://bsky.app/profile/dryad.technology
avatar by: Dana

Public Key

npub1tq4yr3hv50gjeq9v6fy20j8nquxg8jzehxkpwwwtanq8fncf5arsdm6nqn

NIP-05 Address

mcc_at_mastodon.social@momostr.pink

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs9s2jpcmk285fvszkdyj98ereswryrepvmntqh8897esr5euy6w3cpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds6mk050

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1tq4yr3hv50gjeq9v6fy20j8nquxg8jzehxkpwwwtanq8fncf5arsdm6nqn

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-03-31 03:01:17 UTC

Email subjects that will get me to unsubscribe from your list instantly
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/321/552/998/434/444/original/15e0ebd7556c8cff.png

2026-03-30 00:08:16 UTC

*Company makes my life worse through their product*
I will boycott this product
*Company continues making my life worse, now through externalities*
How do I boycott an externality

2026-03-29 19:58:38 UTC

- reply

When I think about "AI" I often think about how we had cities built to be navigated by people, and then we rebuilt the cities to be more easily navigated by cars, and now people without cars can't navigate the cities because we specifically designed them to require cars

2026-03-25 03:02:09 UTC

So there's this guy who made a tool where someone punches in their bluesky or mastodon credentials to his website, and it auto-crawls their feeds and produces an LLM summary of everyone it finds posting there. He was asked what people should do if we don't want to be mulched as content for his summary feeds. He said we should block him. I replied, I can do that, but that only stops *you* from running the tool on me, how do I prevent *your other users* from running your tool on me? He blocked me.

2026-03-23 20:48:48 UTC

- reply

okay so confession I'm only blocking about 800 people and the remainder are the "jesse singal followers blocklist", which I would highly recommend for anyone considering using bluesky as it is a *very* strong antiquality signal

2026-03-23 20:36:21 UTC

- reply

Hm. I'm blocking 11,142 people, so maybe that has something to do with it. Have you considered blocking 11,142 people?

2026-03-23 20:32:25 UTC

My desire to use Mastodon is basically at zero now because post-"Claude", hanging out here means inevitably I'm going to have a conversation with someone who tolerates, or even uses, "generative AI". And what's the point of being in a community where that's a risk. Interestingly* there is absolutely no chance of this on Bluesky, because there are artists there
* And oddly, given how "AI"-brained the *admins* there are

2026-03-15 21:22:52 UTC

If the computer is a prosthetic (and it is) then this means we legitimately have to be careful about what software we run, because we are deciding what to make part of our selves, part of our minds

2026-03-13 00:38:27 UTC

You know you're at a good barbeque place if there's one of these at the table
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/219/070/379/141/730/original/a83cd4d2c7f379a1.jpg

2026-03-12 19:42:16 UTC

- reply

Me: I want to go to CHICAGO and see BEAN
Houston: Come to Houston we have BUDGET BEAN
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/217/906/386/540/934/original/7d94584eeff018f6.jpg

2026-03-12 19:03:13 UTC

Tomashi Jackson exhibition at Houston CAMH is incredible. Definitely a better experience than Toronto CAMH
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/217/752/695/065/530/original/3605d2d7472b8be0.jpg

2026-03-12 16:40:31 UTC

- reply

The repeated lesson here is that a company, organization, computer program, or person who uses the privacy, environmental, and trust disaster sold as "generative AI" for one thing, can no longer be trusted for any thing. If it is tolerated for one thing, it will eventually be used for all things. If a program adds an optional "AI"-branded feature you *have* to stop using that program completely, because if (when) the company feels the use metrics are too low they will stop making it optional.

2026-03-12 16:35:52 UTC

- reply

Now one *assumes* these buttons don't activate unless pressed, but there's a problem. First, the checkbox to disable "Gemini" in Messages itself only turned off an activate-on-select button. Second, on a phone— where "scroll" and "tap" are both taps— accidental activation of buttons is a part of life.
This happens to me again and again, with Google, with Copilot in VS Code, with everything. A company adds an "AI"-branded feature with an off switch, you turn it off, they later enable it anyway.

2026-03-12 16:33:29 UTC

- reply

Related, consider the Android "Messages" app. This has checkbox settings for "Smart Reply"; two additional checkboxes for "suggestions" of stickers and "actions"; and a fourth checkbox, "Gemini in Messages", for explicitly turning off Gemini. I have turned off all of these. Despite this, this week I discovered that if I long-press or open ANY image in Messages, there are two buttons, "Remix" and "Create", which Google's documentation explicitly says network-sends the image to, quote, "Gemini".
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/217/148/312/655/463/original/b9022ec5b13226f7.png

2026-03-12 16:28:41 UTC

Google Mail / "GMail" has no fewer than nine settings for "Smart Features and Personalization", e.g., Gemini. I have these all turned off in order to prevent Gemini ingesting my emails. To do this, you now have to opt out of benign machine-learning or even pattern-matching-based features, like sorting promotional emails from regular ones or spellcheck.
Despite this, as of today, Google is offering a Gemini smart compose feature on all my emails, despite me having turned off smart compose.
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/217/131/956/571/810/original/cadcdcb54eb774f8.png

2026-03-11 04:54:47 UTC

- reply

I have a Steam Deck for games. But I still need to be able to run OBS on the laptop, what if I run the Steam Deck into it

2026-03-11 04:54:04 UTC

- reply

I need vulkan, webgpu, sdl_gpu and complex audio routing. If I can't run flatpaks I'm going to have really big problems. I have a webcam, I have a video capture card, I stream using OBS, I expect my AMD video compression acceleration to work. I expect to use my computer as a computer. I *am* looking at btrfs for my backup drive :(

2026-03-11 03:28:00 UTC

- reply

Thanks for this information. I cannot describe the extent of my sadness at the idea of having to use BSD, but thank you for this information.

2026-03-11 03:25:15 UTC

- reply

thank you for the information; i will be removing linux from my computer at the earliest opportunity

2026-03-11 03:23:34 UTC

- reply

I thought this was only for documentation, for now?
To be clear, it is my intent to eventually move entirely to software which is either no-AI by license or forked from pre-AI code. If it means I have to throw away Linux I throw away Linux. Linux is an inferior product I am *only* using because Windows added AI. Why the fuck am I using Linux if it's also AI?

2026-03-11 03:02:05 UTC

- reply

If it were my project i would ban the contributor. One line or not they are not following the DCO as written which this project requires. So either the DCO is violated, the DCO has a "you can do anything as long as it's through a hole in a sheet" exception for AI, or the DCO is not enforced at all, or most likely this crept up on OpenZFS and they have never thought about this and did not notice the claude line.

2026-03-11 02:54:08 UTC

- reply

So
1. It's installed on at least one dev's computer
2. The presence of a header-disclosed commit could imply non-disclosed commits possibly from the same developer
3. The project is not filtering for such code even when it's disclosed

2026-03-11 02:53:55 UTC

- reply

Ah.
I deleted because if there was any chance of error, I didn't want to leave it up, but a PR'd one line change is still enough for me to complain.
The thing is, my understanding is you have to use the tool in a particular way for it to actually create the committed-with header. For more complex uses I believe the header does not show up.

2026-03-10 23:29:10 UTC

This has happened to me at least 3 times with Google.
- They offer a free service.
- I sign up for the free service.
- A couple years later, they say to continue with the free service you must now do something I don't want to, like pay monthly or agree to put my home address publicly on the Android store.
- I decline, and my account on the service is deleted.
- For literally the next 15 years, I periodically get inscrutable emails about service changes or minor pricing changes in Bhutan
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/207/468/917/659/735/original/89d35a68e9a42edc.png

2026-03-10 16:40:11 UTC

- reply

amazon just formalized this. my criticism. "they tweeted it out". if what the junior vibecoder does is review the generated code, but amazon must mandated the senior engineer does the actual review, then why do you have junior engineers at all? the senior engineer in this case now does the junior engineer's entire job as amazon defines it.

2026-03-10 16:39:07 UTC

- reply

"without senior engineer review"
okay so this hits on an issue i've been thinking a *lot* about
i won't use LLM code generators. i believe i can find a job where i don't have to use LLM code generators. but i would probably still be forced to *work with people who do*. and if someone on your team vibecodes, you vibecode. the work of a vibecoder is code-review and checking. but everyone checks everyone's code. so they're pushing their work onto me. i'm vibecoding for them.

2026-03-09 05:03:54 UTC

*posting quietly as the clock hits midnight* its my birthday

2026-03-07 20:22:51 UTC

The motto of the modern tech industry is "You can just do things to people"

2026-03-06 17:07:24 UTC

- reply

Consider:
- Sokol, early 20th century, Czechia
- Falun Gong, late 20th century, China
Both organizations that are fundamentally about outdoor calisthenics, their activities expanded and/or the government viewed their sheer size as a threat, and the Nazis/Communist Party of Czechoslovakia/Chinese Communist Party oppresses them.
How this fits into the Boxer Rebellion, where boxing self-improvement clubs *did* try to overthrow the government, you'd have to uncover through research.

2026-03-06 17:04:27 UTC

- reply

If you'd like a video I can endorse, here's a good Tim Traveler video about the largest stadium in the world (now abandoned). Things of interest here:
1. I am entirely captivated by the abandoned piano at 2:35, evolved into a sort of permanent planter like the art car that lives in Toronto's Kensington Market
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jF0rGhFf0c4&t=145s
2. The British pronunciation of "Funicular"
3. I am now very curious to see someone do a history of athletic self-improvement orgs being oppressed by governments

2026-03-06 17:01:58 UTC

- reply

For the record, if this wasn't clear: If I ever post a YouTube thumbnail without a link, it's because I only post links when I have actually watched the video and I know it's worth recommending. Like what if it's terrible or poorly researched or racist and I've just linked it to you, like a fool, because of the funny thumbnail. I don't want to post a link unless I can endorse the video.

2026-03-06 16:58:53 UTC

When the youtube video has an intentionally funny thumbnail but you're pretty sure you know what the video's about and they're actually just very straightforwardly describing what happened
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/183/284/217/317/899/original/0a0c58d4ad3fccab.png

2026-03-06 01:04:21 UTC

Welcome to Canada. Okay so what you need to understand is that if you see a link to "the Walrus" that's a real news article but if you see a link to "the Beaver" that's a fake news article

2026-03-05 18:47:38 UTC

- reply

meanwhile people I talk to are like "wait why do you want guarantees your open source supply chain doesn't have LLM-sourced code in it. it has literally never occurred to me that this would be a thing someone would desire"

2026-03-05 03:06:05 UTC

RE: https://lgbtqia.space/@alice/116174173831789756
There are many types of security one might consider: Physical security, information security, operational security. But regardless of what you're doing or protecting against, there's a cross-cutting rule which applies to all such disciplines:
WATCH OUT FOR THE PERSON IN THE BEAR KIGURUMI
#note1xtj…lk6g

2026-03-03 03:57:05 UTC

- reply

Cannot *believe* the shit y'all put up with to use software. I spend half my time trying *not* to use software, and y'all want to use software so bad you'll agree to "binding arbitration" for it

2026-03-03 03:56:16 UTC

Re: https://social.nouveau.community/@andnull/116161245796027671
Well that's a good thing because: https://bsky.app/profile/notnite.com/post/3mg4jiuv7meow

2026-03-02 14:11:56 UTC

- reply

I think the basic casios are great! A lot of them look unobtrusive and they're so cheap you can get a couple $30 ones and swap them out.

2026-03-02 05:01:30 UTC

Started trying to figure out if I could get a watch that is also a compass. Started looking on different shopping sites and did find a lot of options but I noticed a weird pattern, is that they were all explicitly branded as MANLY RUGGED OUTDOOR MILITARY WATCH FOR MEN. Additionally they *tended* to follow designs which are bulky and greebly to no obvious end other than to "look rugged". Are there not women who live in cities and sometimes get confused about which way is north

2026-03-01 19:45:17 UTC

- reply

Even without the "Clyde" problem it's hard to talk about because there's a historical notion of a probabilistic algorithm where you have stochastic behavior operating with proven bounds and a provable distribution of behaviors, and the new type of statistics-based software where the software just sort of does whatever and we don't even discuss it as if it were statistics-based we call it "intelligence"

2026-03-01 19:42:29 UTC

- reply

I do think there is an interesting perspective where computer software based on deterministic execution of instructions *can* be aligned with the goals of a user but computer software based on a trained statistical model cannot, technically, be aligned with anything at all as there is inherently random behavior. But we can't conceptualize that problem because the capital class is lying and saying that their computer has a soul because they named it "Cylde" and drew googly eyes on it

2026-02-23 19:02:42 UTC

- reply

When I say "fork every software project containing code by by 'AI code assistants', starting at the commit before the slop is known or believed to have been added, and resume from there", I really do mean every project
https://donotsta.re/objects/8e2166c6-3e0f-4ea3-8a29-3008702a39f7

2026-02-22 22:17:03 UTC

Everybody seems to like "the bear" and "the pit"

2026-02-22 17:26:56 UTC

By the way, if you go to https://github.com/claude and "block this user", every Github repo you visit containing code credited to Claude will actually have a warning sigil
CF
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/115/451/116/370/911/original/ad8056ce2afbfc7c.png

2026-02-21 22:33:26 UTC

- reply

RE: https://wellduck.me/@greyduck/116110983001607000
I would like the answer to this question as well.
#note1sxl…kvvp

2026-02-21 22:12:08 UTC

- reply

My understanding is that Bitwarden and KeePassXC, the two open source password managers, are *both* using random code generators at this point, which is terrifying as those are the exact tools where a small error could have the largest negative impact, and also tools that once you've committed to using it you can't quickly back out if they enter a code quality decline
https://github.com/bitwarden/clients/tree/main/.claude

2026-02-21 22:07:44 UTC

RE: https://mastodon.scot/@kim_harding/116108957641748718
I want this but as a Linux distribution. I don't think I'm asking for much here. I am just asking for the "open source community" to be to the left of Goldman Sachs
#note1usz…aug6

2026-02-20 21:36:07 UTC

- reply

Based on this visualizer I issue you a challenge.
Bluesky's post limits work like this: You can fit 3000 bytes OR 300 graphemes, whichever is less. I thought at first that hitting the byte limit would be nigh impossible, but it turns out to be pretty easy with emoji: 🤷🏾‍♀️ is 1 grapheme but 17! bytes, thanks to stringing an emoji, a skintone, a gender, and two ZWJs.
My challenge: Can you hit the 3000 byte limit, without hitting the 300 grapheme limit, using only *natural human text*, any language?

2026-02-20 21:29:12 UTC

Got nerdsniped by a request from [@thisismissem.social](https://bsky.brid.gy/r/https://bsky.app/profile/thisismissem.social ) and made a little visualizer tool demonstrating the various ways you can represent "how long is this string?" in Unicode:
https://data.runhello.com/bs-limits/
- Bytes (in the standard UTF-8 recording)
- UTF-16 (irrelevant except in JS, where it's relevant)
- Codepoints (unicode characters)
- Grapheme clusters (the visual "characters" you see on screen)
And how the divergence of the two relates to Bluesky's "unusual" post limit rules.

2026-02-20 18:19:21 UTC

- reply

This turns out to be a very good video. The YouTuber does not assume you have chess theory knowledge going in. I did not laugh out loud until around 8:30 but I did laugh out loud https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpQ9gGwpDGA

2026-02-20 17:47:13 UTC

YouTube thumbnails I am cracking up at today
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/104/205/280/482/709/original/d3ac0b833f8921ee.png

2026-02-20 16:12:42 UTC

This is a very funny page https://unicode-explorer.com/list/large

2026-02-17 19:08:34 UTC

- reply

AI will allow us to reach such high "velocity" that one single engineer can write as many bugs as previously took the entire industry working together

2026-02-17 17:18:10 UTC

What if you tried scrolling the other direction

2026-02-11 03:05:32 UTC

It just this second occurred to me to draw a connection between "Generative AI" and "Liquid Glass" as two technologies which have the effect of making everything appear to be covered in a thin layer of slime

2026-02-10 23:35:20 UTC

IRC is bad, and the reason every time a new chat service collapses people seem to go "literally everywhere except IRC" is that "literally anything except IRC" is what people want

2026-02-09 03:33:04 UTC

*Watching a science fiction movie of dubious quality*
Me: They really understood the right way to use smoke machines in the 80s.
Christine: Pretty sure this is the 90s.
Me: The 90s was when the 80s were perfected.

2026-02-08 22:41:20 UTC

RE: https://mastodon.social/@emaytch/116036998103007299
Fellow tech workers: The librarians are roasting us on Mastodon and we have no plausible defense
#note1fqj…n7xz

2026-02-08 21:36:59 UTC

- reply

<'_> in Rust is the "Wink" operator. The compiler's like "You can't do that" and you're like "*Wink* Yeah, but you'll let it slide this time, right?"

2026-02-08 21:35:55 UTC

- reply

Update: .to_slice() was the magic solution. I need to remember to put this in my "things to try at random when Rust isn't working" along with typing <'_>.

2026-02-08 21:11:25 UTC

- reply

In the docs, ByteStream has a generic argument. However the generic argument's meaning is not documented (it's just "S"). The documentation appears to suggest, rather than filling in this S, using a macro. The macro is not doing what I expect. https://api.rocket.rs/v0.5/rocket/response/stream/struct.ByteStream
I can't tell if Rocket has a specific place to go ask for support requests, unless it's the general Rust programming discord, or here.

2026-02-08 21:10:09 UTC

*rubbing eyes* Anyone use "Rocket"?
The worst/most Ruby-like thing about Rocket is when you return a value from a Route function, you just kinda return… whatever datatype you want, and Rocket figures it out.
Unless it doesn't, and you have *no* idea what to return.
For a string, you return a String.
What do I return for bytes? It's not a string, it's a &[u8; 1335895] and it's not valid UTF-8. Do I return a rocket::response::ByteStream? That seems to be the correct answer but doesn't work
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/037/053/618/528/032/original/a8303735151d86c8.png

2026-02-08 19:31:25 UTC

This object is a legitimate masterpiece of design
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/036/670/790/196/288/original/70327e1a888b678c.jpg
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/036/667/639/852/050/original/9150c847dd3e4642.jpg

2026-02-07 19:42:28 UTC

- reply

More awkward than a time-based criterion, but I guess I could still see economic effects that would incentivize miners to push through a "desert" period when they're losing money per block (because if they push through they have the potential to make money again after the "desert")

2026-02-07 19:38:26 UTC

- reply

By the way, one other thing I've never figured out about the "mine a block" race. Imagine two miners in New Zealand and Spain by coincidence mine a valid block within 0.04 seconds of each other. Due to the speed of light, neither could have known about each other's block at the time they mined the block, but transmission speeds and clock disagreements would make it almost impossible to prove which happened "first". How does the network decide which miner wins the next-block race?

2026-02-07 19:33:01 UTC

- reply

Thank you for explaining, this clarifies several seemingly contradictory things I had previously read.

2026-02-07 19:28:41 UTC

- reply

new blocks are added every ten minutes, right? i guess there's nothing *requiring* a new block to be created, if just nobody adds a block in a ten minute period then one can get added ten minutes after that?

2026-02-07 19:24:26 UTC

- reply

"Miners will subsist solely off those transaction-based rewards"— well, wait. I question "will". That's what I'm trying to figure out. Does the protocol have a means in place to *guarantee* that if the amount people are willing to pay for transaction rewards goes down far enough, some kind of balancing mechanism ensures the next block eventually gets mined anyway.

2026-02-07 19:15:07 UTC

- reply

To be clear, my reason for pondering these things: I believe the total elimination of Bitcoin from the planet is a necessary prerequisite for cryptocurrency becoming a remotely useful or good thing. I'd like to see Bitcoin eliminated from the planet. However, I believe capitalism will always find a way to do the worst possible thing. So *if* there's a path to BTC surviving and continuing to do at least some harm, I assume BTC will find it. I'm trying to see if I can identify that path first.

2026-02-07 19:13:32 UTC

- reply

To elaborate on those two points:
- My understanding of BTC is that there is a "race" element, you need to not just compute hashes but compute them *faster* than your competing miners. If accurate, this means the price of mining could naturally adjust itself downward.
- Bitcoin was always designed for "mining" rewards to be gradually replaced with transaction-processing fees. The number we really want is "cost to add block to chain" / "revenue to add block to chain". Mining rewards are trivia

2026-02-07 19:10:08 UTC

RE: https://mastodon.social/@elasticsoul/116030815240351773
I've long believed Bitcoin is impossible to "kill" but a possibility that didn't occur to me is mining a bitcoin block could start to cost more than one acquires from mining a bitcoin block. And the compute cost of making a block *does* increase w/ time.
This *seems* to show the lines crossed, but 2 questions I have:
- If the number of miners participating decreases, does the cost of mining one Bitcoin decrease?
- How much does earn get in "tips" while spending that $87,000 to mine one Bitcoin?
#note1llv…ml9j

2026-02-07 18:39:25 UTC

Talking to someone about Nix. I make an offhanded comment on how Nix has funding relationships with military contractors and Guix doesn't. I suddenly stop and realize I don't know for a fact whether the GNU project, a software-developing nonprofit, has ever taken military funding. I do a web search.
https://www.thetripolipost.org/libya-gnu-turkey-sign-agreement-on-military-cooperation/
Did NOT see that coming

2026-02-06 17:33:00 UTC

Interesting… just saw a sidebar on a YouTube video for a fundraiser being run by the channel. Was legitimately surprised to see YouTube doing product development to further YouTube itself as a revenue center instead of just treating YouTube as a site for investor storytime about how Google is adopting "AI"
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/024/851/807/134/877/original/ad4b7b9e21d4058f.png

2026-02-05 22:26:06 UTC

Emdash fans! Answer! Do you put spaces around the emdash?

2026-02-05 19:24:16 UTC

Holy cow it's like a graph of gradually escalating Gender
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/019/652/191/828/734/original/3e53094345a439a8.jpg

2026-02-04 20:44:31 UTC

Somebody should invent a socioeconomic system which is good at allocating resources

2026-02-04 18:42:33 UTC

RE: https://mastodon.social/@mcc/116004809011481588
Anyway the reason I roll my eyes at most of the discussion about "AI", "AGI", "the singularity", "intelligence self-improvement feedback loop" is that like, it happened, it's already happened, it's been happening, it's us. We're it.
Kurzweil talked about lusting for a machine that can make him smarter. I have that, it's a piece of paper. I can write math on a piece of paper and solve problems I can't solve in my head. I can upload all the information in the world directly into my brain (books).
#note18z6…sc3g

2026-02-03 04:28:30 UTC

- reply

AGI was developed in 150,000 BCE, when a group of self-organizing iterative-design nanomachines developed structured problem solving skills spontaneously. This became a slow-takeoff singularity when they developed the ability to mechanically increase their own intelligence (writing) around 6000 BCE.
My projections show this AGI hard-locking from viral memetics within the next 200 years, followed by, probably, either gray parrots or gray wolves inheriting the evolutionary niche.

2026-02-02 19:08:12 UTC

You don't use open source software because it's better (it usually isn't).
You don't use open source software because it's freer (it only sometimes is).
You don't use open source software because it's got better politics (it isn't always).
You use open source software because *it is the only option*. In the long run, if it isn't open source, it doesn't exist.
image source: keithstack.com
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/002/630/691/708/770/original/0033f1f66f5f98b5.jpg

2026-02-02 17:33:40 UTC

TFW you are told to implement harfbuzz but instead implement fizzbuzz or, perhaps more dangerously, the reverse

2026-01-28 22:42:27 UTC

- reply

I DIDN'T EVEN NOTICE THAT THE QUESTION IN THE LAST POST LISTS "SLEEPING" AS A POTENTIAL HOBBY??? DID A ROBOT WRITE THIS?? LIKE NOT A LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL AI BUT A ROBOT FROM A 1950S SCIENCE FICTION STORY?!

2026-01-28 22:40:30 UTC

- reply

…is this… … is this question in the Python Developers Survey weird? I feel like this is weird?
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/115/975/126/820/101/100/original/6a5125db73a87e68.png

2026-01-28 22:38:06 UTC

- reply

Amusingly, I did not participate in the Rust Developers Survey this year because there was a question about which RFCs are the most important to you and then I spent the rest of the evening reading RFCs and forgot to finish the survey
Okay I guess that's not really that amusing. It happened tho

2026-01-28 22:37:25 UTC

- reply

I dunno, maybe uv really is objectively better than pdm. A friend showed me pdm and I was like "yeah, this is good, this is better than just using requirements.txt… I will use nothing else forever". The only other thing I've tried was Poetry because i thought it would be cross compatible with pdm (it isn't, and I don't think I liked it as much

2026-01-28 22:36:35 UTC

Hrrrmm… kinda worried about the implications of what it says for pdm that that python developers survey considered Poetry significant enough to include under virtualenv/dependency management tools but not pdm.
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/115/975/109/068/317/747/original/bc286a187666f34c.png

2026-01-27 23:36:23 UTC

*Hacking, wizened voice* Beware ye, afore ye ride the
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/115/969/684/957/225/109/original/d1a07863d38ce11c.jpg

2026-01-27 18:17:10 UTC

- reply

Remembering the 1990s when you were allowed to pick what fonts your computer used

2026-01-27 18:15:18 UTC

- reply

If computers were just bad, that would be more tolerable to me I think. It's the fact that computers start off good and get worse over time. We know things could be better. Software companies *make us know* they're capable of making usable stuff before they go and break it.

2026-01-27 18:13:29 UTC

- reply

Why is everything so mushed together. Why did Google think this was okay
EDIT: Hm, this may not look so bad zoomed in like this. On my tablet the "51" basically look like a single glyph.
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/115/968/410/805/827/244/original/dfe62b2d15b5908e.png
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/115/968/413/617/109/118/original/c8f98571ddec878d.png

2026-01-27 18:01:52 UTC

Firefox recently updated with an uglier font into the url bar and I was like "why'd they do that", but now I'm starting to notice this same font I think in certain other parts of Android, the clock bar, the copy/paste menu. I don't like it. I can't tell if I'm imagining it.
Silent software updates are literally gaslighting! I think something changed, I can't tell if something changed, I'm doubting my own perceptions and mental capability

2026-01-26 14:37:36 UTC

TFW the decentralized social network is down because the centralized service it uses to function is down
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/115/961/903/124/605/782/original/8e620008dd50d259.png

2026-01-22 21:07:01 UTC

TORONTO!! Hwæt!!!
Do you like RIAN JOHNSON do you like the idea of RIAN JOHNSON DOING A MYSTERY because in TWO AND A HALF HOURS, at 6:30 TODAY, the Revue is showing Johnson's first and best film, Brick
https://revuecinema.ca/films/brick/
It is a noir story in a shitty SoCal high school. It's so weird and so incredible, the structure is so interesting and twisty, the cinematography makes ordinary objects cryptic and beautiful, it moves so quickly from "this makes no sense" to "this makes so much sense"
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/115/940/778/244/435/168/original/0daa224c493708b9.jpg

2026-01-22 16:09:17 UTC

- reply

Relative to 1984 it might be accurate, however. Like BASIC is not really that easy. It's easy to learn but that's not the same as it being easy to do things in.

2026-01-21 01:54:03 UTC

THE COMMIT REMOVES 2,000 LINES OF CODE AND ADDS 3,000. COMMIT MESSAGE:
fix gperf_norq stuff
---
THE COMMIT IS A SINGLE CHANGED LINE. COMMIT MESSAGE:
A BackendResource object may contain both an in-RAM representation and an associated VRAM object, or neither. Under some circumstances, having an in-RAM representation but no VRAM handle may result in a ShadowCache entry being created with an invalid handle. Although this is safe, at teardown time it can cause a crash if the monitor thread is b—

2026-01-20 03:46:48 UTC

RE: https://mastodon.social/@Viss/115923109466960526
"We should stop using open source software written using 'AI'", I say
"That's impossible," people tell me. "There's no way you'll be able to tell the code was written using AI"
#note10e6…5edr

2026-01-19 20:22:34 UTC

- reply

POLL: How many rodeos have you been to?

2026-01-19 03:45:58 UTC

Sometimes people on the Internet are talking about a politics thing and are like "this isn't my first rodeo!" and inwardly I am thinking "you have never been to a rodeo"

2026-01-18 21:30:15 UTC

- reply

This is why—although, now Blacksky is letting me "see through" Bluesky's worst moderation decisions, I'm glad, because Bluesky's moderation is weird and arbitrary—I think it's a downside of the network, and Mastodon made the right decision not offering this feature. Fediverse defederation forces a degree of soft group consensus on moderation: it's possible to say "if you're talking to X, I don't want to talk to *you*". On Bluesky we are all ghosts walking through walls and this can't be enforced

2026-01-18 21:25:41 UTC

- reply

Oh, and let's consider, for a moment, the downsides of an individual user being able to "opt out" of moderation decisions. The problem with misbehavior on social media is force multipliers. One person harassing you is no problem; one person and their 3000 friends is a big problem. Imagine Bluesky and Blacksky ban user X but Trumpsky lets X keep posting. Now their 3000 friends— still in Bluesky's good graces— can see their posts calling to harass you, AND can zero-friction zip over to yell at you

2026-01-18 20:57:34 UTC

- reply

Oh and I can't get staging.blacksky on my phone app. So imagine if you were using Mastodon, but you saw a slightly different list of posters, *and potentially a different set of your own posts*, depending on whether you were using your PC or your phone. This is great if there's a banned user you want to follow— you get an *option* to follow them. Mastodon.social can deny me the *option* to follow someone, on Fediverse. But except in that edge case this *might* not be a fantastic user experience!