Fuzzy Peach / is on Nostr

They/he. 🔞 MDNI

I was getting too lewd and flirty on main, so instead of changing my behavior, here's my alt. Please tell me if you're enjoying my pics, I like to know (and see) how much you like them!

I'm pan so appreciate all bodies but my body shape fits the gay bear mold quite well I think :)

Interested in #kink, #polyamory, #nsfwart, and will frequently be horny posting.

Extremely happy to accept lewd/explicit DMs, requests, pics or videos from mutuals.

Last Notes

2024-02-05 23:43:50

- reply

@npub1pz3…0x49 I am never usually drawn to fluff cushions but for these I'd eagerly make an exception!

2024-02-03 10:01:13

- reply

@npub1s7n…75gz It's such an arresting picture because of how you look at the camera.

2024-02-03 06:49:32

- reply

@npub1s7n…75gz I adore the colors and curves in this picture. So close up, it almost leans towards being abstract, but it's grounded by the curves of your beautiful body.

2024-01-04 21:36:24

- reply

@npub1syx…d6lz you wrote something short with lots of generalizations about a contentious topic, saying it is just a new artistic process like collage and you didn't know why people got so bent out of shape by this algorithmic evolution of the form.
They aren't pissed at a new process. They are pissed at services using their own work to undercut them while they try to survive in a capitalist system. To reduce it to their problem with the process is inherently offensive while artists lose livelyhoods

2024-01-04 20:47:37

- reply

@npub1syx…d6lz a straw man is an assertion, a proposition with a plea to consider that it is similar to the original, without addressing the original, and to try to convince readers that settling this assertion also settles the original.
"Historically not outraged artists" is truly a bold and unfounded claim, especially around collage and image reuse.
Are you calling artists with a current, not historical issue with this ignorant? Or are they just misled little sheep, in need of art education?

2024-01-04 20:26:44

- reply

@npub1syx…d6lz I called it weak as it was in essence a straw man - you used prosaic description as the basis for saying that generative art was just collage on a larger scale.
Many artists need to use their artistry to pay bills. How unfit copyright is as a law is a separate discussion, but artists have to use what protections they have to not be exploited by powerful corporations.
A collage requires only the images it uses. Generative art requires ALL the images in its training set for its model.

2024-01-04 19:32:19

- reply

@npub1syx…d6lz that's a weak proposition. One common, expected way to interpret collage art is in terms of how it subverts, references and reinterprets the source images that it uses. The source images can be seen individually and also as part of the whole which makes the art carry more meaning than just the end image. It is fantastic at making mainstream motifs carry minority, counterculture meanings.
Generative art heavy biases towards mainstream prejudices of the crowd to the point of offence.