Elias :cl2:

Hi there! I'm Elias, an Autistic Pedophile and Hebephile.

I like watching anime and playing tabletop RPGs and writing stories.

I'm a moderator on maprightsforum.org, please let me know if you would like an invite code.

Let's make this world a little kinder together.

#MAPpride #MAPpositivity #MAPrights

Pronouns: Ae/aer
Attracted to: Boys, girls, and enbies age 7-14
Matrix: @elias:indivisible.cloud
Website: https://indivisible.cloud/

Public Key

npub1wwjswqpvm2f38n75quswcwwkufs0qfuy5evw8yaf9vzczv6hf0fsc67f5a

NIP-05 Address

freecss_at_mapsupport.de@momostr.pink

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs88fg8qqkd4ycnel2qwg8v88twyc8sy7z2vk8rjw5jkpvpxdt5h5cpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dshlrk9u

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

relay.nostr.bg

Author Public Key

npub1wwjswqpvm2f38n75quswcwwkufs0qfuy5evw8yaf9vzczv6hf0fsc67f5a

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-05-21 05:47:49 UTC

- reply

"there would be no adults left" wait that sounds great actually, where do I sign up for ageism class?

2026-04-15 17:47:59 UTC

If you conflate MAPs with rapists, then you are an anti. It's that simple.

2026-03-11 18:43:52 UTC

This is your irregular reminder that just existing as a MAP in this world can be very draining, so make sure to take good care of yourself and other MAPs. That could be anything from drinking some water or going outside for a walk to listening to a favorite song or indulging in a guilty pleasure. You deserve it.
#MAPpositivity

2026-02-25 19:30:31 UTC

So supposedly there is a bunch of new antis around here because of some yt video or another, looking for people to dox? Well let 'em come at me, at this point honestly they'd be doing me a favor.

2026-02-19 07:53:53 UTC

MAPs stop putting children on an unrealistically high pedestal challenge (impossible).

2026-02-12 16:45:27 UTC

I found the Solarpunk flag very pretty so I decided to make one with the MAP colors. I also considered making the inside of the sun white, WDYT?
#MAPPride #Solarpunk
https://mapsupport.de/system/media_attachments/files/116/058/657/897/567/759/original/7acec6a3ca148594.png

2026-01-10 09:54:00 UTC

- reply

Please stop harassing people to go off this platform. There is no rule that one should be pro-c to be here (I am not either). Even if 99% of the people here are (which I highly doubt) that's no reason to be an asshole.
If you don't like what someone here is posting you can just mute or block them. Problem solved.

2026-01-09 05:51:46 UTC

- reply

If you didn't know better you'd almost think that some people have never been below the age of 18 themselves.

2025-12-22 17:23:24 UTC

I met another MAP for the first time today who I had met online. I used to be a bit stressed about these meetings but now it's becoming just a very nice way to meet someone and talk about a lot of different things without having to worry about what I can or cannot say. We even talked a bit about perhaps organizing a meetup with a larger group of MAPs sometime in the new year. Never believe that you're alone out there!

2025-12-18 07:53:07 UTC

- reply

I still believe it's important for MAP activists to learn about major attempts like Martijn and try to avoid some of the mistakes they made, both in messaging and organisational aspects.

2025-12-18 07:44:00 UTC

- reply

those are both very good points, I admit.
(I know, it's shocking to see someone on the internet admit they were wrong.)

2025-12-17 17:55:32 UTC

- reply

err that's what Martijn attempted in the Netherlands and see where it got them. Just the memory of how that went made basically any form of statement in favor of MAP rights into political suicide. Whereas if they had just argued for better treatment of MAPs rather than also lowering the AOC they might've still been around.

2025-12-08 10:27:15 UTC

On some days when I need a little boost I just rewatch this 5 minute Snail's House animation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDCe1_SzHAc
It never fails to make me feel happy and sad and then happy again.

2025-11-17 13:20:11 UTC

- reply

That's a somewhat non-standard interpretation. The term is more typically used for people before they start puberty, so until ages 10-12 or so. I don't think there should really be a strictly defined boundary, though of course the term should not be used to infantilize or take away any rights.

2025-11-17 13:14:02 UTC

- reply

I agree, not all underage youth are children, but was just referring to the more specific group here. Or do you mean you view the use of the term "child" by itself to be problematic?

2025-11-16 22:23:07 UTC

While it's not illegal or strictly against the rules here, I don't think making jokes about sexual abuse of children is in good taste.

2025-11-14 14:02:24 UTC

- reply

> you would have to also believe that gay people that are against gay marriage aren't homophobic
Of course they are still homophobic. But one can be homophobic and also be the target of homophobia at the same time. Homophobic gay people don't deserve to be discriminated. The same goes for self-hating or bigoted MAPs (or whatever term you want to use for them).
> if you applied "bigots will keep being bigots so we should just ignore their bigotry" to any other group you would rightly be called out for that, it's unambiguous bigot apologia
I'm not saying to ignore them, I'm saying stop doing things that we know will not work. If you want to call me an apologist for saying that also bigoted people still deserve to be treated as human beings, then be my guest, I guess.
> that relies on the assumption that being hostile to bigots is a bad thing
I don't think being hostile to bigots is inherently good or bad, it all depends on what the consequences of that hostility are. Are you actually changing their minds? Are you protecting other people from their bigotry? Then great, go ahead by all means. But please do also consider the negative effects of this hostility if you do it in public, including the effects on non-bigoted people who are just looking for a space where it is safe to be who they are.
I don't have much energy left for this conversation and I don't have the feeling that either of us is going to convince the other, so I will stop replying to it beyond this post (but feel free to have a final word if you need to).

2025-11-13 18:38:14 UTC

- reply

the difference between bigoted anti-cs and antis is that the former are MAPs and the real antis will not hesitate to group them with all the rest of us when they get the chance. When I say I want basic rights for MAPs, I mean *all* MAPs, including the ones who don't think the rest of us deserve those rights.
I would love to live in a world where everyone was as open to being challenged on their beliefs as you say they should be. I really would. But the reality is that the vast majority are not open to being challenged, and trying to do so anything is just an exercise in futility. Meanwhile, this calling-out is creating an atmosphere of hostility that is palpable for all the rest of us who you are not calling out. Speaking words is an action, and actions have consequences. So yes, there are absolutely good reasons for not calling out people even though they are 100% wrong.

2025-11-13 18:16:08 UTC

- reply

well you were the one who brought up the comparison with homophobia.
While I agree that there exist some extreme anti-c people who behave basically like antis in many ways, I don't think that's the majority. Even the ones who are too extreme anti-c in my opinion are just like that because of their past experiences, and they won't change by you getting mad at them or pointing out how wrong they are.
But regardless of which one of us is correct on that, my main point is that it should be possible to exist in online MAP spaces and work together on shared goals towards proper MAP rights *without* getting sucked into debates about contact stances. All of us MAPs - even the bigoted ones - deserve at least that small measure of safety from the relentless hate we get from society.

2025-11-13 06:52:10 UTC

- reply

I imagine that gay people also had (and continue to have) a need to build community and friendships without the constant need to talk about homophobia and how to address it. In fact if your gay community is talking about nothing but homophobia all the time then you're likely excluding a lot of people who are triggered by that topic (just think of reasons why a gay person might be triggered by that) or just don't want other conversations to get overshadowed by it all the time. This is how I feel about much of the contact discourse here on pedi. The fact that it's an important topic to discuss doesn't mean people should be bombarded by it all the time.