That’s a logical fallacy - the is-ought fallacy. Just because something is possible doesn’t mean it ought to be permitted. A lock pick can open your door. That doesn’t obligate you to leave it unlocked.
There’s also a secondary Slippery Slope / False Dilemma buried in the closing: framing BIP-110 as “violence” and “reigning people in” (as if a standardness/relay policy is somehow coercive force rather than nodes choosing what they relay). It is literally the opposite if you actually run a node and understand how decentralized consensus works…
BIP-110 doesn’t prevent anyone from doing anything on-chain. It changes what honest nodes choose to forward. It’s returning bitcoin to a state from before - a decentralized monetary network that actively attempts to prevent chain bloat for security via node consensus.
kymafi / Kyma Fi
npub13m…zv576
2026-05-18 16:43:55 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…zw49
Author Public Key
npub13mhm4fxurhw4pz076twmqttwc03ge5wxdgulaakvp9pxeceaczdqyzv576Published at
2026-05-18 16:43:55 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "2579d9c531d55d81a925def5fbcaead090744d520568fd949fc42401388cefa6",
"pubkey": "8eefbaa4dc1ddd5089fed2ddb02d6ec3e28cd1c66a39fef6cc09426ce33dc09a",
"created_at": 1779122635,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7a1f925fc71120b49474f9305b1fc61db743db56657f206559efae6efd675a15",
"wss://premium.primal.net/",
"root",
"8eefbaa4dc1ddd5089fed2ddb02d6ec3e28cd1c66a39fef6cc09426ce33dc09a"
],
[
"e",
"48a96adb29fb3d79c57b754502812304addb337c8ba595823f8c97a2b202d3ba",
"wss://relay.nostr.net",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"83e818dfbeccea56b0f551576b3fd39a7a50e1d8159343500368fa085ccd964b",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"edf0da8bbdbe11195fb886196abaff586a9092cdcc9c0017b73bd998b2652fa3",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "That’s a logical fallacy - the is-ought fallacy. Just because something is possible doesn’t mean it ought to be permitted. A lock pick can open your door. That doesn’t obligate you to leave it unlocked.\n\nThere’s also a secondary Slippery Slope / False Dilemma buried in the closing: framing BIP-110 as “violence” and “reigning people in” (as if a standardness/relay policy is somehow coercive force rather than nodes choosing what they relay). It is literally the opposite if you actually run a node and understand how decentralized consensus works… \n\nBIP-110 doesn’t prevent anyone from doing anything on-chain. It changes what honest nodes choose to forward. It’s returning bitcoin to a state from before - a decentralized monetary network that actively attempts to prevent chain bloat for security via node consensus.",
"sig": "36a383b4d7e92646dfae544789376e04c7014e4335ccf6cf0e9fcffe03caf7e1d7014d6191c4c3e044050ab04c8bc276ac70bd1213b809b18a8c8a42eab3edb6"
}