Luxas on Nostr: The amalgamation bit was in reference to the Biblical canon. I’m of the opinion ...

The amalgamation bit was in reference to the Biblical canon. I’m of the opinion that Constantine’s forced inclusion of some books and omission of others as apocryphal texts was a collusion for power by his empire and the church and not for the betterment of the followers of Christ. And as such, many translations (Greek/English being the primary one) do not carry over the full historical context as a result. My whole point from the beginning, with the Barabbas example. Which is why I used the word allegedly. Because the history has been tampered with and was already a wild story from the start 😅