Periodically, I see people upset that #Bluesky has become the default alternative to #Twitter instead of #Mastodon. So we need to understand why that happened:
1. Bluesky simply has a better UI/UX for Twitter users than Mastodon because it basically *is* Twitter whereas Mastodon is its own thing
2. When the Twitter migration happened in November 2022, those who managed to get a Mastodon account found that navigating Mastodon's unwritten social norms was difficult
3. Mastodon already had a pre-existing community, one that clashed with mainstream Twitter -- whereas there was no community on Bluesky when Twitter users migrated there
4. Certain marginalized groups, such as Black folk, found a hostile environment here, and many who have stayed remain here because they believe in the tech *despite* the community that exists around it
I cannot understate the role that social discovery had in this. On Bluesky it is easy to find people and topics that are relevant to users whereas on Mastodon this takes a lot of heavy lifting.
That said, there's a silver lining to this. Should Bluesky fail to decentralize and the company alienates their userbase -- which is inevitable -- where will Bluesky users go?
Obviously, to Mastodon.
But when that happens, we need to prepare ourselves for the eventual migration and build a better environment for Bluesky users to come here.
Chris Trottier
npub1e9…xmsz2
2025-02-04 18:52:04 UTC
Author Public Key
npub1e9xty8eww57a3npv2vfl5cel567cd0k4stqu89aa6l0undk0pr8shxmsz2Published at
2025-02-04 18:52:04 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "b5b96ad15bd7f37b3bf2cd84256020c895c9e816711d9f08c572b6fbe083fda5",
"pubkey": "c94cb21f2e753dd8cc2c5313fa633fa6bd86bed582c1c397bdd7dfc9b6cf08cf",
"created_at": 1738695124,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"mastodon"
],
[
"t",
"twitter"
],
[
"t",
"bluesky"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://atomicpoet.org/objects/d7ac8856-7636-4766-a3af-03ada06a5fdf",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://atomicpoet.org/objects/d7ac8856-7636-4766-a3af-03ada06a5fdf",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Periodically, I see people upset that #Bluesky has become the default alternative to #Twitter instead of #Mastodon. So we need to understand why that happened:\n\n1. Bluesky simply has a better UI/UX for Twitter users than Mastodon because it basically *is* Twitter whereas Mastodon is its own thing\n2. When the Twitter migration happened in November 2022, those who managed to get a Mastodon account found that navigating Mastodon's unwritten social norms was difficult\n3. Mastodon already had a pre-existing community, one that clashed with mainstream Twitter -- whereas there was no community on Bluesky when Twitter users migrated there\n4. Certain marginalized groups, such as Black folk, found a hostile environment here, and many who have stayed remain here because they believe in the tech *despite* the community that exists around it\n\nI cannot understate the role that social discovery had in this. On Bluesky it is easy to find people and topics that are relevant to users whereas on Mastodon this takes a lot of heavy lifting. \n\nThat said, there's a silver lining to this. Should Bluesky fail to decentralize and the company alienates their userbase -- which is inevitable -- where will Bluesky users go?\n\nObviously, to Mastodon.\n\nBut when that happens, we need to prepare ourselves for the eventual migration and build a better environment for Bluesky users to come here.",
"sig": "44c5243a87ec825cb548aaca158c9d72b4cd638f6df1aab1f98994633880c47f1f518f4324b21ac8bf1a44eb007533a09864d85ee1d20902ed298e5eb7c916cc"
}