BIP 110 is one of the most important protocol improvements in the history of BTC. It’s essentially a rejection of Core - they have been accepting VCFunds (even proven to have received funds from Epstien through a cut out) and allowing them to influence and alter the code- making changes that allow for inscriptions, runes, memecoins and even a stablecoin to be embedded permanently on chain.
The issue with this is that it centralizes nodes - it becomes so bloated that one cannot easily install on a basic laptop. The more nodes and accessible to the average person - the safer the system becomes.
There’s also social issues with core - maintainers were chosen based on race and gender instead of merit and because of this Core v30 was rushed and delivered before it was ready - it had bugs which deleted wallets and bitcoin was lost. This is a hostile act that must be met with resistance.
It’s not controversial that Bitcoin should be purely money with no data storage uses. That’s what Satoshi intended. That’s what BIP 110 sets out to do. Core is using complex excuses and propaganda to protect their funding. They do not listen to the node runners and their requests.
*ps don’t listen to the haters here - even bip110ers don’t really understand sometimes and will say stupid things and make ad hominem attacks - sorry for that
kymafi / Kyma Fi
npub13m…zv576
2026-04-05 14:39:49 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…j3vf
Author Public Key
npub13mhm4fxurhw4pz076twmqttwc03ge5wxdgulaakvp9pxeceaczdqyzv576Seen on
wss://relay.damus.ioPublished at
2026-04-05 14:39:49 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "216521d68ef25cfd3782e9d9ac7c88baff359b3baa758859c14da14ffb1ca112",
"pubkey": "8eefbaa4dc1ddd5089fed2ddb02d6ec3e28cd1c66a39fef6cc09426ce33dc09a",
"created_at": 1775399989,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"49597690344363cbe93ee742a3e246fcfb49f792f7c62df37ba179b38e022498",
"wss://relay.primal.net",
"root",
"846307688a09ec112967eb0544e78a9e88c48f50712c39ed491ff2b6fa019ae8"
],
[
"e",
"fbb26aef5a69cecd2e15f14a0185287c38741fd56031c5389e33f79155eac73a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"846307688a09ec112967eb0544e78a9e88c48f50712c39ed491ff2b6fa019ae8",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"1831195b48ea73731623bc9d9ba9d874a8d694879f5f7d5f8ab68120dafe6c4c",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "BIP 110 is one of the most important protocol improvements in the history of BTC. It’s essentially a rejection of Core - they have been accepting VCFunds (even proven to have received funds from Epstien through a cut out) and allowing them to influence and alter the code- making changes that allow for inscriptions, runes, memecoins and even a stablecoin to be embedded permanently on chain. \n\nThe issue with this is that it centralizes nodes - it becomes so bloated that one cannot easily install on a basic laptop. The more nodes and accessible to the average person - the safer the system becomes. \n\nThere’s also social issues with core - maintainers were chosen based on race and gender instead of merit and because of this Core v30 was rushed and delivered before it was ready - it had bugs which deleted wallets and bitcoin was lost. This is a hostile act that must be met with resistance. \n\nIt’s not controversial that Bitcoin should be purely money with no data storage uses. That’s what Satoshi intended. That’s what BIP 110 sets out to do. Core is using complex excuses and propaganda to protect their funding. They do not listen to the node runners and their requests. \n\n*ps don’t listen to the haters here - even bip110ers don’t really understand sometimes and will say stupid things and make ad hominem attacks - sorry for that ",
"sig": "85bb98409388f75d3f446794a3ec36fae63a9714068ebf1a14fea48b72b4323f1234f22c3f65f9ff91f7c293ae96d81aeae8b085706a83e0a5af3b86705b5426"
}