This here IMHO is the actual problem with Google's "AI results" RAG summary. They *directly tasked it* to trust top results from an internet search & repeat them with confidence.
It matters to the searcher whether the top result is from e.g. nature.com vs. from theonion.com. But not to the summary.
(Enn) Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦 /
npub1he…mt5aq
2024-05-25 08:51:46
Author Public Key
npub1heu2etyvawcef07up78c35uzyvz5usnkemdqhvlvxwsufgx5v74qymt5aqPublished at
2024-05-25 08:51:46Event JSON
{
"id": "2600d359a4d6bed2df9a15596f8ddebf17ff19a7780dabf68f17522fa7e04bf6",
"pubkey": "be78acac8cebb194bfdc0f8f88d38223054e4276ceda0bb3ec33a1c4a0d467aa",
"created_at": 1716627106,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://bsky.brid.gy/convert/ap/at://did:plc:whp3lnoglalzs5dcsxw25mhq/app.bsky.feed.post/3ktchmiffic2i",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "This here IMHO is the actual problem with Google's \"AI results\" RAG summary. They *directly tasked it* to trust top results from an internet search \u0026 repeat them with confidence.\n\nIt matters to the searcher whether the top result is from e.g. nature.com vs. from theonion.com. But not to the summary.",
"sig": "c5b7946c17dc1586167614965327c2821bc31dfc37a6fe16494d57fec68178da8ef49861f8201efaa616fa15a5b0c8b076204a1756eebe1487a64f26404c49bb"
}