Issues could take cashu tokens, encrypted by the creator of the issue (+ whoever wants to add on a bounty) with some p2pk key that the author can release upon declaring their issue as solved. This would incentivize certain issues being solvedhttps://gitworkshop.dev/nevent1qvzqqqqx25pzqen829vwvvu0az0a5svwg2st72n69vfj2pxax3lszkscjudkg3psqyfhwumn8ghj7emfw3hx7um5wghxxmmd9uq3camnwvaz7tmwva5hgtnyv9hxxmmwwashjer9wchxxmmd9uqzqllj0fhhwrxwmmnh7v9pg8v6vv4djtjtvza7xhzfty5yhrgh02ex25vz20
---
bounty: 10k sats
DanConwayDev on Nostr: I saw your bounties implementation, but I felt it was too tightly-bound to LNURL and ...
I saw your bounties implementation, but I felt it was too tightly-bound to LNURL and gives too much credence to the code creator vs the reviewer, when the biggest costs are in the review. What do you think about ideas in this thread? ie. leaving the payment out of band?
