Diffgeometer1 on Nostr: Let \(\pi: SO(n+1)\rightarrow S^n\) be the map given by\[\pi(P)=Px\]where \(x\in ...
Let \(\pi: SO(n+1)\rightarrow S^n\) be the map given by\[\pi(P)=Px\]where \(x\in S^n\) is some fixed element of \(S^n\). Then \(\pi: SO(n+1)\rightarrow S^n\) is a principal \(SO(n)\)-bundle. Assume \(n>2\). However, my intuition is that this cannot be a trivial principal bundle since it would imply\[SO(n+1)\simeq S^n\times SO(n)\]which I don't think is right. I don't know what the de Rham cohomology of \(SO(n)\) is. If I can show that the left and right sides have different de Rham cohomology groups that would prove that \(\pi: SO(n+1)\rightarrow S^n\) cannot be a trivial principal bundle. Does anyone have a simple way of showing that \(SO(n+1)\) cannot be homeomorphic to \(SO(n)\times S^n\)? Also I want to avoid the use of characteristic classes or \(K\)-theory. I want to limit things to homology, cohomology, and fundamental groups only.
Published at
2024-10-04 01:57:24 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "4172f171ff3c6f1e1455291d66abb7fcf9a63adb677b61691a3846b7dfdc569b",
"pubkey": "bb6dc4ab260b2a8cff27af8205547de195b0a9edb0d6c1b2ccc0d81da411d836",
"created_at": 1728007044,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mathstodon.xyz/@Diffgeometer1/113246669696632076",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mathstodon.xyz/users/Diffgeometer1/statuses/113246669696632076",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://mathstodon.xyz/users/Diffgeometer1/statuses/113246669696632076",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Let \\(\\pi: SO(n+1)\\rightarrow S^n\\) be the map given by\\[\\pi(P)=Px\\]where \\(x\\in S^n\\) is some fixed element of \\(S^n\\). Then \\(\\pi: SO(n+1)\\rightarrow S^n\\) is a principal \\(SO(n)\\)-bundle. Assume \\(n\u003e2\\). However, my intuition is that this cannot be a trivial principal bundle since it would imply\\[SO(n+1)\\simeq S^n\\times SO(n)\\]which I don't think is right. I don't know what the de Rham cohomology of \\(SO(n)\\) is. If I can show that the left and right sides have different de Rham cohomology groups that would prove that \\(\\pi: SO(n+1)\\rightarrow S^n\\) cannot be a trivial principal bundle. Does anyone have a simple way of showing that \\(SO(n+1)\\) cannot be homeomorphic to \\(SO(n)\\times S^n\\)? Also I want to avoid the use of characteristic classes or \\(K\\)-theory. I want to limit things to homology, cohomology, and fundamental groups only.",
"sig": "815a2eb9b44a0d62b7feac240316985a3b76b0f06315d9893ee7719ee167785b065b77c857d4fe37c4b9dc76f75b9786ff16139ff4ec7024dd4241e728f56383"
}