But antis instead focus on a hyper-specific type of grooming (someone older, usually of legal age and amab, performing sexual grooming on someone who's under the legal age, and it is implied all the grooming done is non-consensual), and this doesn't *actually* help. Because any grooming that doesn't fall into this narrow category is either ignored or downplayed as not actually happening
Hot take but antis exposing groomers doesn't benefit people getting groomed in general. More criminalisation of an action doesn't prevent it