gjm on Nostr: So I genuinely think that you are missing the point I am making. The content of the ...

So I genuinely think that you are missing the point I am making. The content of the bible needs to be read, reviewed for coherence and then communicated. This action is done by a human. Without the human the content cannot be communicated. It remains static. The bible does not do the teaching. The human does. I agree that some humans have influenced the moral paradigm of much larger groups of humans by using content from the bible, but the teaching is not the result of the bible itself, rather by various individuals and groups of humans who examine, interpret and then systematise the contents into a form that can be used to communicate ideas. The bible in and of itself cannot accomplish any teaching objective without having a human in the loop to do said teaching.