Join Nostr
2026-03-02 21:56:13 UTC
in reply to

El Duvelle on Nostr: nprofile1q…lkmch Definitely, see my other answer here In the end I'd say the ...



Definitely, see my other answer here
https://neuromatch.social/@elduvelle/116161779140284723

In the end I'd say the question is "who should benefit from the copyright", not whether the LLM's output is copyrightable or not, because I don't see why it wouldn't be. Obviously it's not going to be easy to figure it out, but in theory all those who contributed to the output (including in the training set) should be considered as contributors. The LLM itself, like a typewriter, is not a contributor.