MDB on Nostr: Can we force Bitcoin to become non taxable? The real question is simpler. Should a ...
Can we force Bitcoin to become non taxable?
The real question is simpler.
Should a free society tax people for moving and protecting their own savings in the hardest money that exists?
Money is just stored time and energy.
Taxation on productive activity already exists through income and consumption.
When the state starts taxing every movement of savings itself, especially in a scarce asset like Bitcoin, it is no longer only raising revenue.
It is shaping and controlling how people are allowed to save and exit the fiat game.
Fiat is designed for inflation and silent confiscation.
Bitcoin is designed for scarcity and voluntary opt in.
So the next strategic move is not only price appreciation.
Bitcoin should be treated like base money, not a speculative toy.
Saving in Bitcoin should not trigger a penalty every time you move UTXOs or rebalance.
Citizens can still pay fair taxes on income, capital formation and consumption, while the monetary rail itself remains clean and free.
If enough people understand that taxing Bitcoin at every movement is the same as taxing freedom of exit, the political cost of that policy will rise.
Once nation states start to depend on Bitcoin for reserves, energy markets and settlement, they will be forced to choose.
Crush adoption with constant reporting and capital gains on every small move,
or embrace Bitcoin as neutral savings technology and let productivity and innovation grow on top of it.
The next attack vector is not only the chart.
It is the legal code.
It is how we define property, savings and financial autonomy in a digital age.
Price is just the surface.
Sovereignty is the end game.
Published at
2025-11-09 14:05:14 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "67cbf5e4b04259f01620a8359bd2341b9c613acbac261b2348c6ca8ac87ba632",
"pubkey": "6b4c612991132cf4c6c390dceaae75041b9954ba4f9c465aca70beb350815a57",
"created_at": 1762697114,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "Can we force Bitcoin to become non taxable?\n\nThe real question is simpler.\n\nShould a free society tax people for moving and protecting their own savings in the hardest money that exists?\n\nMoney is just stored time and energy.\n\nTaxation on productive activity already exists through income and consumption.\n\nWhen the state starts taxing every movement of savings itself, especially in a scarce asset like Bitcoin, it is no longer only raising revenue. \n\nIt is shaping and controlling how people are allowed to save and exit the fiat game.\n\nFiat is designed for inflation and silent confiscation.\n\nBitcoin is designed for scarcity and voluntary opt in.\n\nSo the next strategic move is not only price appreciation.\n\nBitcoin should be treated like base money, not a speculative toy.\n\nSaving in Bitcoin should not trigger a penalty every time you move UTXOs or rebalance.\n\nCitizens can still pay fair taxes on income, capital formation and consumption, while the monetary rail itself remains clean and free.\n\nIf enough people understand that taxing Bitcoin at every movement is the same as taxing freedom of exit, the political cost of that policy will rise. \n\nOnce nation states start to depend on Bitcoin for reserves, energy markets and settlement, they will be forced to choose.\n\nCrush adoption with constant reporting and capital gains on every small move,\nor embrace Bitcoin as neutral savings technology and let productivity and innovation grow on top of it.\n\nThe next attack vector is not only the chart.\nIt is the legal code.\nIt is how we define property, savings and financial autonomy in a digital age.\n\nPrice is just the surface.\nSovereignty is the end game.",
"sig": "49a174a1bf52a1b839506c39fb3e0d4125f0e07fb86adda8df52a1a64fd354d3a5ddd26617fd43e64e45a86553c73db4155a2c7cfe2a63da97d7cdb5ed194f0a"
}