Taggart :ifin: on Nostr: I'm not super familiar with Red Hat, but can someone do a sanity check for me? The ...
I'm not super familiar with Red Hat, but can someone do a sanity check for me? The recommended mitigation for DirtyFrag is to add the relevant modules to a modprobe blocklist. But...I wasn't aware the modules were loaded dynamically? At least on Fedora, they were not.
I very much want to be wrong about this. And expect I am, but want to be sure.
https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/RHSB-2026-003Published at
2026-05-09 02:30:21 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "e26398ec926b9d8ce4096efd4d8eae02158c741add658c057a9c394c5335f53a",
"pubkey": "3ba412ac4b14c4b37cd6ed16b9d262ad4ffefb05c5b6c6b3e15e381471b1221a",
"created_at": 1778293821,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://infosec.exchange/users/mttaggart/statuses/116542263894503423",
"activitypub"
],
[
"client",
"Mostr",
"31990:6be38f8c63df7dbf84db7ec4a6e6fbbd8d19dca3b980efad18585c46f04b26f9:mostr",
"wss://relay.ditto.pub"
]
],
"content": "I'm not super familiar with Red Hat, but can someone do a sanity check for me? The recommended mitigation for DirtyFrag is to add the relevant modules to a modprobe blocklist. But...I wasn't aware the modules were loaded dynamically? At least on Fedora, they were not.\n\nI very much want to be wrong about this. And expect I am, but want to be sure.\n\nhttps://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/RHSB-2026-003",
"sig": "1702cbfdde9c3272ab73ba6fdc70812ff8d130db83cc1d9c1a7e61cc2fd288bd049d8e23bd29195e0a39c6e79753f6e90bc0640842a7641244008e3751a00775"
}