I assume it’s not intentional and is an artifact of Mac interpreting whatever you’re applying to make sure the separate lowlines combine.
Doesn’t show up so distinctly in the t̲s̲ combinations (but still subtly visible in the subpixels).
Kent Lew on Nostr: nprofile1q…emjt5 I’m curious about this rendering of the double combining ...
nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqxqvg6z2tg4ap6226ylzrppvgak9vh5vdadx5g0ygjhspyzj24zhshemjt5 (nprofile…mjt5) I’m curious about this rendering of the double combining lowlines in the d̲z̲ combination.
I assume it’s not intentional and is an artifact of Mac interpreting whatever you’re applying to make sure the separate lowlines combine.
Doesn’t show up so distinctly in the t̲s̲ combinations (but still subtly visible in the subpixels).
I assume it’s not intentional and is an artifact of Mac interpreting whatever you’re applying to make sure the separate lowlines combine.
Doesn’t show up so distinctly in the t̲s̲ combinations (but still subtly visible in the subpixels).