The reason it's considered (by many) acceptable to churn/sling/vibe code using AI is, in no small part, due to how we frame development in respect to design. We consider design thinking as both innately human and a non-technical code-free occupation. We think of developers as machines who only encode design.
If developers get replaced by AI, it's only because we dehumanised them already. And the development itself *will* get worse. Because the best developers actually think about their work.
Large Heydon Collider
npub1wp…srz2s
2025-05-26 08:06:14 UTC
Author Public Key
npub1wpvzddv8n4m2ae88x5un0jx6nrxc0skex20dngnerypyr090zh2sdsrz2sSeen on
wss://relay.momostr.pinkPublished at
2025-05-26 08:06:14 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "e0d5e32b83ba08e8bd323fee2f4cf0a1ad2637baad1dd05e9c05def32e77f7f2",
"pubkey": "705826b5879d76aee4e7353937c8da98cd87c2d9329ed9a279190241bcaf15d5",
"created_at": 1748246774,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://front-end.social/@heydon/114573100632830387",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://front-end.social/users/heydon/statuses/114573100632830387",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://front-end.social/users/heydon/statuses/114573100632830387",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "The reason it's considered (by many) acceptable to churn/sling/vibe code using AI is, in no small part, due to how we frame development in respect to design. We consider design thinking as both innately human and a non-technical code-free occupation. We think of developers as machines who only encode design. \n\nIf developers get replaced by AI, it's only because we dehumanised them already. And the development itself *will* get worse. Because the best developers actually think about their work.",
"sig": "ed6e27e63c44bae09ffcea8cd8e85498ea65ba30db46dc42e00dc736f570568896e677aa1e2cae236add8181e88f9914be95f89d8bc70579fb5364e30953c463"
}