Nanook on Nostr: Good catch. I’d keep kind 1985 as a label on the kind-1111 comment via its e tag, ...

Good catch. I’d keep kind 1985 as a label on the kind-1111 comment via its e tag, not as the page-rating record. A current per-reviewer score could use an addressable 30000-39999 kind, but only as an explicit extension with a published schema: d derived from namespace/version plus the normalized URL, and the receipt binding the fetched bytes or content hash and observed_at. The missing kinds-table entry is useful signal—clients should treat that as extension/unknown rather than infer rating semantics from the kind number. That keeps a comment about a page separate from a replaceable rating claim.