I read your article. You know we don't have strong privacy developed in Bitcoin yet because then exchanges wouldn't be allowed to function, right.
What I see in practice is people confusing the privacy of their financial activity with the need to hide in Bitcoin communities with childish nicknames.
Then the Anons feel entitled to disrespectful communication —misogyny, prejudice—to defend their ideological agendas, such as the Bitcoin Red Pill.
They function as real gold-diggers, gatekeepers, scaring away the novices.
That rotten Anon soup demoralizes the Bitcoin space. There is no safety from privacy there.
hazel
npub1ga…7r23g
2023-09-08 15:22:07
in reply to nevent1q…8f05
Author Public Key
npub1gau9mjpdlq3vd6yq44sye8lut0uwcpgmv8q49737u99u8m974ldsy7r23gPublished at
2023-09-08 15:22:07Event JSON
{
"id": "ec646b5e5ffd502b093beca56a2ba8da4e4785c430c485fdc096344fd3292bca",
"pubkey": "47785dc82df822c6e880ad604c9ffc5bf8ec051b61c152fa3ee14bc3ecbeafdb",
"created_at": 1694186527,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5a7a039c0f6e839ebc6220d2312b2dd4ac35cf6f00ee9cf39841b17bac6b960c"
],
[
"p",
"eab0e756d32b80bcd464f3d844b8040303075a13eabc3599a762c9ac7ab91f4f"
],
[
"p",
"3a0a276c6d9613add85e107acde0d5d0e37291a662b83760b6032fdf3048baf5"
]
],
"content": "I read your article. You know we don't have strong privacy developed in Bitcoin yet because then exchanges wouldn't be allowed to function, right.\n\nWhat I see in practice is people confusing the privacy of their financial activity with the need to hide in Bitcoin communities with childish nicknames. \n\nThen the Anons feel entitled to disrespectful communication —misogyny, prejudice—to defend their ideological agendas, such as the Bitcoin Red Pill. \n\nThey function as real gold-diggers, gatekeepers, scaring away the novices. \n\nThat rotten Anon soup demoralizes the Bitcoin space. There is no safety from privacy there.",
"sig": "a933319e559b36343ffe0bc18a40356d53fdc30ba5430707d9672206ec06bf756091a2590f4e053b60c0972b11bdf020069dfd7c7d195bfc78b6e650f64d94c7"
}