imnuso on Nostr: Generally, philosophically, I agree with you. However, I’m referring to the ...

Generally, philosophically, I agree with you. However, I’m referring to the psychological definition and, unfortunately, this is not how psychological tests are constructed. The construct of agreeableness is a little different there. Since they’re looking for general tendencies and not for case sensitive reactions (that would be integrity) most of what you call integrity will most likely show in psychological tests as lowered agreeableness. It’s not a problem except for its bad framing. Content wise it’s overlapping to a huge degree.