theHigherGeometer on Nostr: nprofile1q…0hcpk Standards for the computer sciences section or the mathematics ...

nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kytcqyzhnpcu29aguxkxft902s38lq5sxq2303p2u8sec4pwv8utm2nzjwc0hcpk (nprofile…hcpk) Standards for the computer sciences section or the mathematics section? The former has cracked down on review articles, which apparently were always kinda off-topic there, but perhaps tolerated. Mathematics is different as far as I know. Also, When people of the stature of Atiyah, Mac Lane, et al, or Thurston, write opinion pieces about mathematics, I think that this is clearly not AI slop. Suppose Scholze or Tao or Yau or Uhlenbeck (!) or .... today posted something to math.HO about the nature and practice of mathematics that was going to be published in the Bulletin AMS. I don't think the arXiv would say no.