nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqdnn8lhve69yuy85zzcnl7aymzlr4t6dwhq55hkc4tzf3typen65sxsfdcj (nprofile…fdcj)
I agree to some extent, and I'm also not a lawyer, but instead of saying that the output of a LLM can't be copyrighted, I think it would mean that the question is who should benefit from the copyright (or patent). Certainly not just the person who entered the prompt. Instead it would be more like a group work: all of those who contributed to any of the LLM's inputs: all the authors of the stolen work + the person who programmed the LLM + the person who prompted the LLM. The machine itself is not doing any work - just following instructions, like my typewriter, but in a more complex manner.
(Edited my previous post to add this)
It's definitely interesting to think about it!
El Duvelle
npub18a…tsqg8
2026-03-02 21:48:05 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…7t93
Author Public Key
npub18a7nwfvwjv5nvwz72pel0tze5anappsy0lf8xa0p5k8rdsneaxssntsqg8Seen on
wss://relay.ditto.pubPublished at
2026-03-02 21:48:05 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "cddb6d1da351b7d724dfe6c69d08cb099aedfe4bb6241253a6ede3a33d0d059c",
"pubkey": "3f7d37258e932936385e5073f7ac59a767d086047fd27375e1a58e36c279e9a1",
"created_at": 1772488085,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"6ce67fdd99d149c21e821627ff749b17c755e9aeb8294bdb1558931590399ea9",
"wss://relay.ditto.pub"
],
[
"p",
"8ca0240eaf6bc332736f59eb486087e2113d7b599910cea6bd90b6a21460134f",
"wss://relay.ditto.pub"
],
[
"e",
"83f69585372daef2ba319648ef37f3c1156f56303ab51f6b75ac6a2faed099c8",
"wss://relay.ditto.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://neuromatch.social/users/elduvelle/statuses/116161779140284723",
"activitypub"
],
[
"client",
"Mostr",
"31990:6be38f8c63df7dbf84db7ec4a6e6fbbd8d19dca3b980efad18585c46f04b26f9:mostr",
"wss://relay.ditto.pub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqdnn8lhve69yuy85zzcnl7aymzlr4t6dwhq55hkc4tzf3typen65sxsfdcj \nI agree to some extent, and I'm also not a lawyer, but instead of saying that the output of a LLM can't be copyrighted, I think it would mean that the question is who should benefit from the copyright (or patent). Certainly not just the person who entered the prompt. Instead it would be more like a group work: all of those who contributed to any of the LLM's inputs: all the authors of the stolen work + the person who programmed the LLM + the person who prompted the LLM. The machine itself is not doing any work - just following instructions, like my typewriter, but in a more complex manner.\n\n(Edited my previous post to add this)\n\nIt's definitely interesting to think about it!",
"sig": "0df86c2ffc9b0feb484d264777481558ed762ac1a1072dd5588cd6eb1cf2aadbf3ae77f1da3ba6897bc8712d1591d965f4d2a400512bb277e297acf269540be8"
}