Join Nostr
2026-10-15 11:50:19 UTC

lux 🦊:therian: on Nostr: funnily enough if you actually read the Developer Certificate of Origin as written in ...

funnily enough if you actually read the Developer Certificate of Origin as written in 2006 it would completely disallow LLM usage. Point b) reads

> The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source license and I have the right under that license to submit that work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part by me, under the same open source license (unless I am permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated in the file; or

and it's not even truly me making an argument that LLMs violate free licences by being trained on unclear material, my point is mostly that *nobody fucking knows*. Multiple lawsuits are underway on that topic. It's not a settled question. It's so utterly dangerous to risk accepting AI-assisted contributions if you *pretend to care* about licencing at all.

(but also licences don't matter. only two kinds of people care about licences: those we don't have the money to enforce them and those who have enough money not care and send lawyers if need be)