postr on Nostr: trying to understand your bitcoin lens: i think maybe anything (anything?) can be ...

trying to understand your bitcoin lens:

i think maybe anything (anything?) can be described in terms of physics. but quantum physics can possibly allow a description of _bitcoin_ as quantum computation…in an ideal sense of how things play out/manifest/are realized…

if it’s (somewhat) accurate…i’ve been intrigued.

also, though, i can think how everything depends on the language one uses to describe something.

and so also, there’s the thought that if everything “is physics,” then so is bitcoin.

///

then to calle’s quantum slop points…

spoke w a physics professor last year who basically said (as said elsewhere too) that quantum computing has a materials problem. it’s an issue w the physical hardware that makes it (currently?) infeasible, like it’s a problem for room temperature superconductivity.

#wishiknewmorephysics!