On surface they paint it as something good but it serves evil people hungry of power.
quoting
nevent1q…gjck
Hugo Turner says it:
Having wasted hours arguing with Ukraine’s supporters lately I usually give up in disgust when they completely deny Euromaidan was western funded since until recently this information was freely available to the public on the NED website and in other sources so in honor of these misinformed “information warriors” heres an excerpt from my article “Ukraine: From Euromaidan to Civil War”
The U.S. tactic of Color Revolution is quite simple the U.S. funds armies of activists, social media influencers and journalists via hundreds of NGO’s that it funds via USAID and the NED. They work to indoctrinate people to demand human rights, democracy, and other buzzwords while ignoring the glaring inequalities in society, the brutality of the American empire and other topics of concern to genuine revolutionaries. They work to discredit the government weaponizing genuine grievances about corruption incompetence and lack of transparency etc. Eventually when the U.S. decides it’s time to launch a coup aka “Color Revolution” it mobilizes this network of NGO’s and uses it’s journalists and social media influencers to get ordinary citizens to join the protests. If they can manage to get 1% of the population to gather in the capital they can demand the president step down and will appear to be supported by an overwhelming majority of the populace. Any attempt at a violent crackdown makes it easy to portray the president as a violent dictator. Eventually the President is forced to resign, flee or is brutally murdered. A new government is formed usually even more corrupt and incompetent then the old one. Around the world naive people celebrate this triumph of democracy and then forget all about the country in question until the next crisis.
As I mentioned earlier in Ukraine 2014 this recipe for a largely bloodless color revolution had an extra ingredient that had been introduced during the “Arab Spring” ie introducing violent extremists into the mix. In Libya and Syria it was al Qaeda offshoots and other terror groups like the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, Al Nusra, or ISIS. In Ukraine it was violent neo-nazi paramilitaries like Rights Sector, Bratsovo and CI4. C14 were the new military wing of the Svoboda party created to replace Patriot of Ukraine the 14 stands for the infamous 14 words of American Neo-Nazi David Lane and doubtless a play of words on the explosive C4 in Ukrainian the name looks like Sich which is what the Cossacks called their fortresses. Ukrainian fascists love referencing Sich’s as there is another fascist group called Karpatska Sich.
A familiar figure from the Orange Revolution Oleh Rybachuk Yushchenko’s liaison to the Ukrainian (and probably western intelligence agencies) during the Orange Revolution. In 2008 Pact Inc an HIV Umbrella NGO funded by USAID gave 7 million dollars to Rybachuk’s NGO UNITER. In 2010 Rybachuk created the Ukrainian Action Center (better known as Center UA)which was an umbrella group of 60 NGO’S of activists and journalists that would form the basis for the network of liberal activists that would take part in the Maidan revolution. UNITER would eventually involve into the New Citizen Group which would play a major role in the Maidain Revolution and by 2013 had grown into an umbrella group of 150 NGO’S. Among the journalists and activists it funded was Mustafa Nayem he worked for Ukrainska Pravda (a USAID funded newspaper) worked for Hromadske TV which Geoffrey Pyatt allocated $50,000 as soon as he became Ambassador in August 2013 and had set up the Soros funded Ukrainian Crisis Media Center and Euromaidan PR. Nayem an ethnic Afghani had voted for Svoboda back in 2012. His brother was the lawyer for C14. Mustafa Nayem also ran the Stop Censorship Campaign which claimed Yanukovych was on the verge of becoming the next Putin.
Nayem would secure his place in history when he launched the entire Maidan revolution the night of November 21, 2014 with a single facebook post after Yanukovych had refused to sign the EU association agreement. Pro- Maidan journalists and academics love to tell this story how a single face book post inspired 50 protestors to show up the crowd grew to hundreds, then thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands. The whole thing is less miraculous when you realize Nayem was simply part of a network of 150 NGO’S funded by the U.S. Canada, the EU and the UK. In addition to government funders their are also the corporate donors who have worked for decades with the CIA using their foundations to funnel money to various political warfare projects. Back during the Cold War the Ford and Rockefeller foundations were the most infamous for this. In the post cold war era George Soros has become most notorious for this he played a major role in funding NGO’s in numerous color revolutions in eastern Europe including both the Orange Revolution, and Euromaidan in Ukraine. In Ukraine Soros had set up the International Renaissance Foundation. In 2013 there was also a new player on the scene the Omidiyar network which provided $500,000 to Rybachuk’s Center UA equal to 36% of it’s budget. The Omidiyar network funded many other NGO’S as well. Omidiyar went on to buy the faux independent media outfit The Intercept."