Paul on Nostr: Has anyone done a systematic, wide-ranging evaluation of making public transport free ...
Has anyone done a systematic, wide-ranging evaluation of making public transport free to everyone? There would be a loss of fare revenue but I can think of lots of upsides:
1. Shorter dwell times = lower fuel costs
2. Fewer road accidents = saving to NHS and economy
3. Faster journeys due to reduced congestion
4. Lower air pollution = saves the NHS money on respiratory conditions
5. More people using = can charge advertisers higher rates
Would these offset the loss of fare revenue?
Published at
2025-09-10 11:47:12 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "ca1351ace703084897105076f0351ee137a63ce2364f3e096abc6028bfc790aa",
"pubkey": "243f76efa4bc2f2813a262d6358cd8813c5a85f8f40ec6fd523d195e4f9bbd2c",
"created_at": 1757504832,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://social.xk7.net/@pwaring/115179836687020100",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://social.xk7.net/users/pwaring/statuses/115179836687020100",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://social.xk7.net/users/pwaring/statuses/115179836687020100",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Has anyone done a systematic, wide-ranging evaluation of making public transport free to everyone? There would be a loss of fare revenue but I can think of lots of upsides:\n\n1. Shorter dwell times = lower fuel costs\n\n2. Fewer road accidents = saving to NHS and economy\n\n3. Faster journeys due to reduced congestion\n\n4. Lower air pollution = saves the NHS money on respiratory conditions\n\n5. More people using = can charge advertisers higher rates\n\nWould these offset the loss of fare revenue?",
"sig": "0ced31d7b34e3c6d286c96bec9c1d026a6a7f0f87d424c179d4b384c78e82495e1206a182fd43ea45c3fa3738cb4782b609503ad9a38421ee538a764601597f7"
}