Nuh on Nostr: I think you are not noticing what I am saying; whoever slashes the sequencer could ...

I think you are not noticing what I am saying; whoever slashes the sequencer could have been themselves the Data Availability Committee and sign on all blocks... Unless you mean slashing with BitVM which means the data has to be posted with BitVM hacks... In which case I check out.

Either way, it is not clear why should we bother with introducing a challenge system for DA, when we already have a proof of publication, and we would be using it not to post dick butts but to basically add something that everyone agrees is needed.

Is it really better to post tons of inflated data with BitVM challenges, than just write contracts onchain and hold the escrows accountable that way.

I didn't even mention the effect of watching the demand for smart contracts evident on chain.

Anyways, I think I understand your position now, thanks.