General consensus here seems to be that people really like the Qualcomm ultrasonic under-display fingerprint scanners in the Samsung Galaxy S series.
While my personal favorite is the side-mounted capacitive scanner (especially when integrated w/ power button), I do prefer ultrasonic UDFPS over optical UDFPS for the same reasons many have stated: Generally better, faster recognition; works with wet fingers; works under any lighting condition (ie. you don't get flashbanged at night).
Mishaal Rahman /
npub13u…5kcsa
2024-07-03 17:50:32
Author Public Key
npub13uavycwuwcz43n4l8mnt3y09lczv4rz4uxlhnhw7ygs8hcyh657s55kcsaPublished at
2024-07-03 17:50:32Event JSON
{
"id": "b17b1e8879184daeb85ccc7df4cb4a438c1cd0ca729cf295de18822901157630",
"pubkey": "8f3ac261dc760558cebf3ee6b891e5fe04ca8c55e1bf79ddde22207be097d53d",
"created_at": 1720029032,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://androiddev.social/users/MishaalRahman/statuses/112723822685639103",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "General consensus here seems to be that people really like the Qualcomm ultrasonic under-display fingerprint scanners in the Samsung Galaxy S series. \n\nWhile my personal favorite is the side-mounted capacitive scanner (especially when integrated w/ power button), I do prefer ultrasonic UDFPS over optical UDFPS for the same reasons many have stated: Generally better, faster recognition; works with wet fingers; works under any lighting condition (ie. you don't get flashbanged at night).",
"sig": "ead0406890ef854e6dcc9dad606bf1f5bb51a7d3215de0c71d920fe795cbf9dd506fdeef66c855464ce9f17230147dd21279a4f2f2304be575a2270e4913f886"
}