techie women don't have children. There’s a Swedish study based on population data from the 19th century onward that shows that the minimum number of children necessary to have reasonable statistical assurance that you will have living descendents in a century is 5:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040260822000211
There are additional hazards to fertility these days. Sodomy used to be illegal, and you didn’t have to worry about your sons cutting their dicks off to become sex toys for perverts. They were highly likely to be married and having kids of their own by 22 — now the average age of first marriage for white women is over 30. So essentially, the actual present day minimums are likey higher, but the basic floor we know of from historical data is 5 children. If you are providing men with less than 5 children, you are essentially statistically killing him. The primary thing any man of reasonable intellect is concerned about is securing the existence of his presence on earth. If you are prepared to have 5+ children, then you are a potential mate of value. If you are not, which most “techie women” are not, you are literally a manifestation of death, an oversized and overpriced fleshlight that will doom the lineage of any man naive and unfortunate enough to choose you as a mate to either significant diminishment or complete material extermination from this plane of existence.
weev
npub1we…409xg
2026-05-12 09:41:28 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…zca0
Author Public Key
npub1weev88wc43slz6jjlq2h30ltmd0ccu9utfe8wet2kkax0w6epavqw409xgPublished at
2026-05-12 09:41:28 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "b4f11fff958db2936568283fdd31ee3667750646eaeebadbb535f0bd7b6b530a",
"pubkey": "7672c39dd8ac61f16a52f81578bfebdb5f8c70bc5a7277656ab5ba67bb590f58",
"created_at": 1778578888,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5991410ac9d38c7f5259faaf47dd605f55af44cbcd7c276826bc41f08192804e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"2f52b19fe1408f69ee0e909ed8fcac138c5f370c05de24f0d8370ada79752323"
]
],
"content": "techie women don't have children. There’s a Swedish study based on population data from the 19th century onward that shows that the minimum number of children necessary to have reasonable statistical assurance that you will have living descendents in a century is 5:\n\nhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040260822000211\n\nThere are additional hazards to fertility these days. Sodomy used to be illegal, and you didn’t have to worry about your sons cutting their dicks off to become sex toys for perverts. They were highly likely to be married and having kids of their own by 22 — now the average age of first marriage for white women is over 30. So essentially, the actual present day minimums are likey higher, but the basic floor we know of from historical data is 5 children. If you are providing men with less than 5 children, you are essentially statistically killing him. The primary thing any man of reasonable intellect is concerned about is securing the existence of his presence on earth. If you are prepared to have 5+ children, then you are a potential mate of value. If you are not, which most “techie women” are not, you are literally a manifestation of death, an oversized and overpriced fleshlight that will doom the lineage of any man naive and unfortunate enough to choose you as a mate to either significant diminishment or complete material extermination from this plane of existence. ",
"sig": "25f93e3d600c251c41f718b82933510b28f0ef36cb91b5b5e411126cf8f24606c925b8ed59bf6b00662d7774a8b83c299bbfc6097dab62c9c569d172d2bf02ac"
}